The day following Boris Nemtsov's murder on
Friday, February 27, Western media were in a gluttonous frenzy over the tragedy.
The death is being offered as affirmation of the nearly-unanimous villainous image
that Putin has in the West. He is believed to be a ruthless dictator who will
stop at nothing, including the murder of Alexander Litvinenko, Anna
Politkovskaya, and many other journalists who dared to oppose him.
As a result, media stories need merely mention that opposition politician
Nemtsov was murdered and an immediate connection is made in people's minds. It
reinforces existing beliefs, even if they were never based on factual evidence.
Some media outlets suggest it's too early to know exactly what happened. CNN,
for instance, stated, "It's not clear who is behind the killing." But
the network then went on to present an expert guest who said "this points
to some kind of government involvement." What was his evidence? He
responded that "anyone who gets in the way of the state is killed."
The network even replayed an earlier program on which CNN feature reporter
Anthony Bourdain remarked, "Bad things seem to happen to critics of
Vladimir Putin."
Headlines in the New York Times played to Putin's stereotyped image as well:
--Obama, Kerry Condemn Killing of Russian Opposition Figure
--After Boris Nemtsov's Assassination, "There Are No Longer Any Limits"
--Fear Envelops Russia
After Killing of Putin Critic Boris Y. Nemtsov
Some outlets referred to Nemtsov as "the" opposition leader, as if he
were the head of organized opposition. For example, a Reuters headline read,
"Russian opposition leader Nemtsov shot dead in Moscow." That left media audiences to
assume that Putin had knocked off someone who was his main opponent.
A lot of skepticism is expressed about the murder investigation. Most suggest
in some way that Putin taking charge of the investigation is like putting the
fox in charge of guarding the hen house. Kurt Volker, former U.S. Permanent
Representative to NATO and now executive director of the McCain Institute told
Fox News, "We've seen other political murders in the past, journalist Anna
Politkovskaya for example, and the killers there nearly always escape."
Senator John McCain issued a personal statement: "Boris is dead because of
the environment of impunity that Vladimir Putin has created in Russia."
McCain is chairman of the Senate Committee on Armed Services. James Inhofe, the
senior member of McCain's committee authored the bill to send Ukraine lethal military
aid. When asked about Nemtsov's murder, Inhofe told the media that he could see
by a picture of Putin's face that he did it.
It was Inhofe's expertise in analyzing photographs that led him to introduce his
legislation to send lethal arms to Ukraine. He presented his Senate
colleagues with photographic evidence that Russia
had invaded Ukraine.
Unfortunately for Inhofe's credibility, it was later demonstrated that he had
used photos of Russian military vehicles in the 2008 South
Ossetia conflict.
Was Inhofe being dishonest or had someone duped him about the photos? An Inhofe
aide is reported to have explained "These were presented to the Armed
Services Committee from a delegation from Ukraine in December." He added
they had "thoroughly checked our sources again prior to releasing the
photos, and felt confident proceeding because the photos also match reporting."
I find it very distressing to see the level of incompetence on which the bill
to arm Ukraine
with lethal weapons is based.
Interestingly, Ukraine
is already playing a role in the Nemtsov death story. The Telegraph reported,
"Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko said on Saturday Russian opposition
politician Boris Nemtsov was murdered because he planned to disclose evidence
of Russia's involvement in Ukraine's
separatist conflict."
That reminded me greatly of the 2006 Alexander Litvinenko case. There, Putin
was accused of ordering the poisoning of Litvinenko because he was about to
reveal proof of Putin's culpability in the murder of Politkovskaya. Although
Litvinenko lived for several weeks after his poisoning, he never released his
evidence. I wonder if we'll ever see Nemtsov's evidence. And if we do, I wonder
if it will include Inhofe's photographs.
Do the Litvinenko and Nemtsov cases really have that common thread? If so it
would appear that in the end, Nemtsov was reduced to being just another
Litvinenko: an expendable human being used to advance someone's unsubstantiated
allegations against Putin.
(Article changed on March 2, 2015 at 11:10)
3
3
3
