103 online
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 15 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 3/23/09

Top US Official Confirms Pakistan Facing Threat

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   3 comments
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Muhammad Khurshid
Become a Fan
  (7 fans)

OpEdNews is the first news outlet which hinted at the threat to the very integrity of Pakistan, which is frontline state in war on terror months ago. But now the new US administration has succeeded in bringing stability to Pakistan, but still a lot to be done. The confirmation of top US official that Pakistan is facing serious threat and needing more attention is a proof that OpEdNews is the most credible and progressive media outlet.

Though there may be a lot of people, who will not agree with me, but this is the fact that Pakistan is needing more attention of the world. Actually Pakistan system of goverance is corrupt, therefore, it has failed to face the threat from terrorism. Now the people are looking to the US for remedy. Till now the US new administration headed by Barack Obama has shown very good performance. One thing should be kept in mind no problem can be resolved through use of military force. Democracy is the best weapon through which terrorism can easily be defeated. The US diplomacy is successful at the moment.

The Pakistani state could collapse within six months if immediate steps are not taken to remedy the situation, warned a top adviser to the US Central Command.
David Kilcullen, who advises CENTCOM commander Gen. David H. Petraeus on the war on terror, urged US policy makers to focus their attention on Pakistan as a failure there could have devastating consequences for the entire international community.
In an interview to The Washington Post published on Sunday, Kilcullen, who is credited with the success of the US troop surge strategy in Iraq, warned that if Pakistan went out of control, it would "dwarf" all the crises in the world today.
"Pakistan, hands down. No doubt," he said when asked to name the central front in the war against terror.

Asked to explain why he thought Pakistan was so important, Kilcullen said: "Pakistan has 173 million people, 100 nuclear weapons, an army bigger than the US Army, and al-Qaeda headquarters sitting right there in the two-thirds of the country that the government doesn't control."
He claimed that the Pakistani military and police and intelligence service did not follow the civilian government; they were essentially a rogue state within a state.
"We're now reaching the point where within one to six months we could see the collapse of the Pakistani state, also because of the global financial crisis, which just exacerbates all these problems," he said.
"The collapse of Pakistan, al-Qaeda acquiring nuclear weapons, an extremist takeover--that would dwarf everything we've seen in the war on terror today."

Kilcullen, an Australian anthropologist who advises governments on Muslim militancy throughout the West, disagreed with the suggestion that it was important to kill or capture Osama bin laden.
He discussed two possible scenarios for catching the al-Qaeda leader. Scenario one is, American commandos shoot their way into some valley in Pakistan and kill bin Laden.
This, Kilcullen said, would not end the war on terror and would make bin Laden a martyr.

The second scenario: a tribal raiding party captures bin Laden, puts him on television and says, "You are a traitor to Islam and you have killed more Muslims than you have killed infidels, and we're now going to deal with you." They could either then try and execute the guy in accordance with their own laws or hand him over to the International Criminal Court.
"If that happened, that would be the end of the al-Qaeda myth," said Kilcullen.
He said that three lessons learned in Iraq could also apply to Afghanistan. The first one is to protect the population. "Unless people feel safe, they won't be willing to engage in unarmed politics," he argued.
The second lesson is to focus on getting the population on America's side and making them self-defending. And then a
third lesson is to make a long-term commitment.
Kilcullen said that the Obama administration's policy of reaching out to moderate elements of the Taliban also had several pitfalls.
"If the Taliban sees that we're negotiating for a stay of execution or to stave off defeat, t
hat's going to harden their resolve," he warns.
"I'm all for negotiating, but I think the chances of achieving a mass wave of people turning against the Taliban are somewhat lower in Afghanistan than they were in Iraq."

Source: dawn.com

Rate It | View Ratings

Muhammad Khurshid Social Media Pages: Facebook Page       Twitter Page       Linked In Page       Instagram Page

Muhammad Khurshid, a resident of Bajaur District, tribal areas situated on Pak-Afghan border is journalist by profession. He contributes articles and news stories to various online and print newspapers. His subject matter is terrorism. He is (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Change The System Then There Will No Terrorism

Indo-Pak Tension Affecting War On Terror Badly

Public Execution By Taliban Increases Terror In Tribal Areas

Is Osama Alive Or Really Dead?

Obama Doing Well On The Foreign Front

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend