Power of Story Send a Tweet        
- Advertisement -

Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (2 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   1 comment
OpEdNews Op Eds

"Tight little butt." Appropriate basis for endorsement?

By       Message Press Release       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     Permalink

Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags  Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 10/17/10

Author 1781
- Advertisement -

Women and moms running for office are subjected to outrageous sexist comments from media pundits and commentators. It hurts their campaigns and creates a toxic environment for all women and moms.

Tell the media: cover real issues, not body parts!

- Advertisement -


Take Action
(
Image by Moms Rising)   Permission   Details   DMCA

Take Action

- Advertisement -

Wonder why we'll likely have fewer women in Congress after the November elections than we've had in the last three decades? [1]

Well, one reason might just be because the current women running for office are too often subjected to outrageous sexist comments from media pundits and commentators--commentators who talk more about female candidates' physical attributes than about the attributes of the policies they support. From likening female U.S. Senators to prostitutes, to rating candidates based on their body shapes, media commentators are repeatedly crossing the line. [2]

For example, on September 20, a Boston-area disc jockey at WRKO said this about the Republican candidate for State Treasurer, Karyn E. Polito: "I think she's hot. She's tiny, she's short. She's got a banging little body on her. Facial wise, I give her about a seven. Body wise, I give her about an eight-and-a-half. Tight little butt. I endorse Karyn Polito." [3]

Not helpful, WRKO. Sexist media coverage like this has a proven negative impact on voters' likelihood to support women candidates and it creates a political environment that's frankly toxic for all women and mothers. [4] With all of that in mind, it's sad, but not so very surprising to hear that fewer women (and mothers) are expected to be elected this year than in the past three decades. [5]

Turn this trend around! Take a moment now to help stop the domino effect of media commentators focusing on the physical attributes of female candidates and ignoring real issues which creates a toxic political climate for all women (and mothers).

- Advertisement -

*Sign on with 1-click to our short, but direct, letter to WRKO--and other media commentators who cross the line--that says:

"Cover real issues, not body parts. Stop focusing on the physical attributes of female candidates and ignoring issues that impact families every day like fair pay for women, jobs, access to healthcare and childcare, family leave, and other family economic security policies."

http://action.momsrising.org/go/443?akid=2348.36612.PlGWLd&t=4

We'll first deliver this letter to WRKO, and then continue to deliver it in the future at strategic moments when we hear about other media commentators who also engage in sexist commentary. To help us do this, let us know if media commentators near you are engaging in sexist commentary by emailing: MEDIAWATCH@MOMSRISING.ORG

Why are we doing this? With the election coming up on Tuesday, November 2nd, we've got to keep on our toes by: both countering sexist language in the media and...remembering to vote! And heck, we've got big political and economic muscles, so let's flex them! As more than 50% of the electorate, and as the key economic decision-makers in over 80% of all consumer purchases, women have tremendous power. [6]

*Take a moment now to mark your calendar to vote by November 2nd--and also don't forget to click below to help stop the domino effect of media commentators assuming it's okay to to only focus on the physical attributes of female candidates:

http://action.momsrising.org/go/443?akid=2348.36612.PlGWLd&t=6

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Idle No More-- The Indigenous People's Revolution Begins

"March Against Monsanto" Planned for Over 30 Countries

Bernie Sanders Blocks Bernanke Confirmation... With Bi-Partisan Support

Bush and Associates Found Guilty of Torture

Statement of 911 Widows In Response to 12/25 Terror Attempt

Family Farmers Amplify Legal Complaint Against Monsanto's GMOs