Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 7 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
Sci Tech    H1'ed 9/25/26  

This is what deregulation looks like

By       (Page 1 of 5 pages)   No comments

Katie Singer
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Katie Singer
Become a Fan
  (13 fans)

Moss Landing Battery Energy Storage System Fire, Sept. 18, 2026.
Moss Landing Battery Energy Storage System Fire, Sept. 18, 2026.
(Image by youtube.com/watch?v=HWUH576JOhM)
  Details   DMCA

Moss Landing Battery Energy Storage System Fire, Sept. 18, 2026.

Do you know Hammurabi's Codes? The Babylonian king wrote them around 1750 B.C.E. to protect people from new technologies' hazards and to hold a builder liable if their project caused harm. More famously, he also called for "an eye for an eye." Hammurabi's codes are still relevant: before any bridge, building, highway, water treatment facility, electrical system, smart meter, smart phone, cell site, solar PV system, wind facility, battery energy storage system, EV charger, data center (etcetera) goes live, the builder must ensure that the technology will not imperil life, health or property.

Like every engineer, every public utility commissioner, every FCC and FDA reviewer, every technology user should assume that no device or tool or infrastructure is safe until proven safe.

Alas. While corporate projects develop with unprecedented speed and scale, local and federal agencies-- designed to evaluate and monitor hazards and enforce safety regulations-- increasingly do not protect the public sufficiently. This leaves ordinary citizens (with significantly limited resources) tasked to discover and prevent potentially hazardous consequences of massive, complex projects-- like battery energy storage systems (BESS) or data centers.

I usually focus on electricity, electronics, telecommunications, Internet access. But public land use, drilling and mining; food, pesticides and pharmaceuticals; worker safety; and aeronotics also depend on reviewed, monitored and enforced regulatory protections.

Corporations tend not to like regulations, because they slow projects (and profits) down.

For the last century, independent, state-licensed, liability-carrying professional engineers (PEs) evaluate and mitigate hazards of new technologies or building projects to "prove" their safety. If a PE certifies that a project's design is good to go-- and the building collapses or catches fire because of its design, the PE is liable. If a builder does not follow correct design, the builder holds liability.

Utilities provide what modern society considers essential services: electricity, natural gas, water, waste disposal, wired landlines, mobile phones and the Internet. PUCs protect consumers, including when utility-monopolies provide infrastructure without competition. PUCs obligate corporations to provide nondiscriminatory access, affordability, reliable service, safety and fair handling of consumer rights.

PUC commissioners, city councilors and county commissioners should not permit a new project until PE-certified documents prove that the project will not imperil life, health or property.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was established under President Nixon in 1969 to ensure that all Americans have clean air, land and water; that contaminated lands and toxic sites are cleaned up and revitalized; that federal laws protecting public health and the environment are fairly and effectively enforced.

What happens when projects are permitted without proof of safety? When they're not sufficiently monitored after they're built?

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Katie Singer Social Media Pages: Facebook Page       Twitter Page       Linked In Page       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Katie Singer writes about nature and technology in Letters to Greta. She spoke about the Internet's footprint in 2018, at the United Nations' Forum on Science, Technology & Innovation, and, in 2019, on a panel with the climatologist Dr. (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

First comes love, then come unintended consequences

Exploring humanness during radioactive times: a review of "SOS: The San Onofre Syndrome: Nuclear Power's Legacy"

Before, during and after Election '24

What my world needs now

A wild idea, a bitter remedy

Discovering Power's Traps: a primer for electricity users

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

No comments

 

Tell A Friend