Power of Story Send a Tweet        
OpEdNews Op Eds

The "solutions" to the Orlando shooting that will only make things worse

By       Message Trevor Timm       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     Permalink

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags  Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 6/19/16

Author 87840
Become a Fan
  (2 fans)
- Advertisement -

Reprinted from The Guardian

Politicians on all sides have wasted little time in proposing a range of counter-productive initiatives, from expanding surveillance to bombing foreign countries

President Barack Obama and FBI Director James Comey discuss the mass shooting in Orlando
President Barack Obama and FBI Director James Comey discuss the mass shooting in Orlando
(Image by The White House)
  Permission   Details   DMCA

As with many tragedies, a host of politicians are now trying to exploit the mass murder in Orlando to push all sorts of proposals that would have done little or nothing to stop the attack either, but could have a huge effect on our rights.

- Advertisement -

The first thing Republicans did on Monday was try to use the tragedy to call for expansive new surveillance powers for the FBI -- despite the fact that the FBI had no problem surveilling the Orlando attacker while they were investigating him. As the New York Times noted on Monday: "FBI agents in Florida used multiple investigative tools, including an undercover informant who made contact with the suspect, wiretapping his conversations, and pulling personal and financial records" when they first investigated him in 2013.

But Republicans didn't let the facts get in the way. They want to massively broaden the use of national security letters, controversial and unconstitutional tools that the FBI would be able to use to get people's email records and internet history without involving a judge or courts at all. Of course, they can already get this with a court order, but Republicans (and the Obama administration) want as little judicial scrutiny over these activities as possible.

Unfortunately, Hillary Clinton's "solutions" are much similar: she hinted Monday she is for expanding surveillance capabilities as well, saying we needed an "intelligence surge" to "bolster our capabilities across the board, with appropriate safeguards here at home." She neglected to mention that we're in about Year 15 or so of an "intelligence surge" that has seen our national security agencies receive literally hundreds of billions of dollars and their legal capabilities expand at every turn.

- Advertisement -

She also claimed we should "get back to ... the spirit of 9/12." Ah yes, the days of secretly planning illegal surveillance, torture, and worldwide war. Where do we sign up?

Click Here to Read Whole Article


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It


Trevor Timm is a co-founder and the executive director of the Freedom of the Press Foundation. He is a writer, activist, and lawyer who specializes in free speech and government transparency issues. He has contributed to  The (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Sen. Dianne Feinstein's New NSA Bill Will Codify and Extend Mass Surveillance of Americans

Everyone loves Bernie Sanders. Except, it seems, the Democratic party

DOJ Investigation of AP Part of Larger Pattern to Intimidate Sources and Reporters

Why the Panama Papers should be a US election issue

If Trump leaks are OK and Clinton leaks aren't, there's a problem

One good thing about Donald Trump's campaign: it's ruining Jeb Bush's