The Syrian charade now proceeds under a vague "cessation of hostilities" -- which is not a ceasefire -- to be implemented within a week. Further on down the road, as this is the real world, "hostilities" will inevitably resume.
Reprinted from Sputnik
Secretary of State John Kerry and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov
(Image by U.S. Department of State, Channel: statevideo) Details DMCA
There could hardly have been a more appropriate start for the Chinese Year of the Monkey, geopolitically, than the prime monkey business enacted in Munich between US Secretary of State John Kerry and Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov.
As Lavrov stressed multiple times, "we made proposals on implementing a ceasefire, quite specific ones." And yet Washington and the Saudi-Turkish combo relented. A frightened, cornered House of Saud -- with its remote-controlled "moderate rebel" gaggle being routed on the ground -- even started spinning the ludicrous notion of sending ground troops, a.k.a., a bunch of mercenaries, to "help the US effort" against Daesh (ISIS/ISIL/IS).
The monkey business reached such a level of un-sustainability that Russian premier Dmitry Medvedev felt compelled to tell an interviewer from Germany's Handelsblatt, "The Americans and our [Arab] partners must think hard about this: Do they want a permanent war?"
True to its trademark, clueless foreign policy mode, there's not much left for Team Obama except spinning.
The proverbial unnamed "US officials" spin on overdrive on Western corporate media that this postponed "cessation of hostilities" is a Russian trap -- as Washington wanted an immediate ceasefire (no wonder; CIA remote-controlled "moderate rebels" are also being routed.) European and Arab vassals spin that Damascus and Moscow are "torpedoeing the peace efforts."
And yet Kerry caved in -- to realism, actually. Lavrov must have made it very clear the two non-negotiables for Russia; win the Battle of Aleppo, still in progress, and seal the Syria/Turkey border against any manifestation of the Jihadi Highway, "moderate" or otherwise.
Do the Munich Spin
There's a nifty historical echo about the war in Syria being negotiated in parallel to the Munich Security Conference -- traditionally dedicated to global security. But the most pressing question is whether this new Munich Pact will actually hold.
What's certain is that Daesh (ISIS/ISIL/IS) and al-Nusra Front, a.k.a, al-Qaeda in Syria, will keep being targeted by both Russians and Americans even after the "cessation of hostilities."
The "4+1" coalition -- Russia, Syria, Iran, Iraq, plus Hezbollah -- will also keep targeting every outfit remotely connected with Jabhat al-Nusra (and they are legion).
The Syrian Arab Army (SAA) will for its part intensify its attacks against Daesh (ISIS/ISIL/IS). Call it the "all roads lead to Raqqa" syndrome. As soon as the Syria/Turkey border is sealed -- with crucial input by the YPG Kurds -- the march to Raqqa will be inevitable.
Enter extra Exceptionalistan spin, according to which NATO is "exploring the possibility" of joining the US-led from behind coalition against Daesh (ISIS/ISIL/IS).
This is nonsense; the Pentagon is already implicated. Major powers at NATO such as France and Germany want to extricate themselves from a Syrian crisis, not to get into a ground war. The whole charade amounts to Turkey's Sultan Erdogan desperately trying, over and over again, to get NATO into the fray, even if it that takes a lethal provocation of Russia; after all his dream -- now in tatters -- of creating a "safe zone" on the Turkey/Syria border refuses to die.
That Hostile Sultan