350 online
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 64 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 1/12/17

The Repubs.' New -- Old -- "New-Trumpian" Base: The Religious Right, Part 1

Follow Me on Twitter     Message Steven Jonas
Become a Fan
  (21 fans)
George H.W. Bush's Father, Prescott Bush, helped finance Hitler's rise to power.
George H.W. Bush's Father, Prescott Bush, helped finance Hitler's rise to power.
(Image by Kingdom Studies)
  Details   DMCA

In the 1980 Repub. primaries, Ronald Reagan won a convincing victory over George H.W. Bush. Reagan was considered a "new" Republican, in the Barry Goldwater mold, while George Herbert Walker Bush was considered an "old" Republican, in the Nixon mold, but with the latter's many rough edges burnished away. Bush was indeed an old Republican, but from a line of true right-wingers, very unlike Ike "Let's Continue on with the New Deal but Just Modify it a Bit Here and There" Eisenhower. In fact, a G.H.W. Bush grandfather, George Herbert Walker, was a very early (1923) foreign contributor to Adolf Hitler and the German Nazi Party.

GHW's father, Prescott Bush, was a banker for Nazi Germany, who continued doing business for them after Nazi Germany declared war on the United States following the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. Indeed, Franklin Roosevelt, who of course knew the Bushes socially, had to call Prescott in February, 1942 and threaten him with arrest and imprisonment under the Trading with the Enemy Act if he did not stop doing so.

None of this information was ever made very public, however, and GHW Bush sailed along, both politically and in government, becoming CIA Director under President Gerald Ford, 1976-77. Of course, among other things, this Texan was "Texan oil" while Reagan, the former "B movie" movie star and spokesman for Chesterfield cigarettes and General Electric, later Governor of California, was, in part, at least, backed by California oil (as well as a group of very wealthy, right-wing, California businessmen, brought together behind him by his second wife's [Nancy] far right-wing physician father).

And in the primaries Reagan was moving steadily Right, never letting Bush outflank him, beginning what I have for some years now called the Rightward Imperative of the Republican Party. It had started when Nixon developed what was called "The Southern Strategy" (politically taking over the South when the Democrats pushed through civil rights legislation in the mid-1960s) and the "War on Drugs," both racist enterprises aimed at cornering the racist/white supremacist vote for the Repubs. (a strategy that has worked very effectively for them down to this very day).

Reagan added a new wrinkle for them, which has also worked down to this very day: forging a close alliance with the Religious Right. Now both George and Barbara Bush, as noted being, in relative terms, old-line Republicans, and certainly traditional Protestants, were believers in birth control and in fact had been long-time Board members of the Texas Branch of Planned Parenthood. Reagan surprised Bush with the offer of his Vice-Presidential slot. One of the conditions he placed on the offer was that both Bush's resign from their Planned Parenthood Board seats. Which they promptly did. And so began the Republicans' alliance with the Religious Right, which has grown ever-closer over the years.

As is well known, the Religious Right is against equal rights for the LBGTQ community, is against freedom-of-choice in the outcome of Pregnancy, is against birth control in general and using public funds for its support in particular, is for taxpayer funding for parochial schools and home-schooling (most of which is carried out by Religious-Rightists who don't want their children "tainted" by "modern" ideas like the theory of evolution or the scientific understanding that human-caused global warming is a very real and very present danger), and in general are against any government regulations that offend their "religious sensibilities." And these policies have been central planks in both Repub. policy and the Party's platforms for many years now.

The Party has long fought to maneuver the anti-abortion rights (hardly "Pro Life") movement into a position where Roe v. Wade could be successfully overturned by a Republican Supreme Court. In modern times, the Party is violently opposed to the Obergefell decision extending gay marriage rights to all 50 states, strongly opposes any efforts the Federal and State levels to provide discrimination protections for the LGBTQ community, and so-on-and-so-forth, and many elements in it would hope that a Repub. Supreme Court would overturn it too.

And so, in every election from 1980 through 2012, win or lose, the Religious Right was a central part of the Republican base. For example, in the 2004 Presidential election, Karl Rove, running an increasingly unpopular candidate (President George W. Bush), arranged to put antigay marriage amendments-or-such on the ballots of 12 swing-and-usually-reliably-red-but-not-always states to draw Religious Rightists to the polls. The strategy worked, to perfection. In 2012, Mitt Romney supported the "person-at-birth" Constitutional amendment.

But then came the 2016 election and the rise of you-know-who. Not exactly an ideal candidate with whom to woo the Religious Right: twice-divorced/thrice-married, a proudly boastful "lady's man," a former Democrat who had supported abortion and gay rights, and who as an upper-crust New York businessman has many gay friends and associates, who in his businesses did not, shall we say, operate at the highest level of ethical standards, was not a regular church-goer, mis-cited the Bible when given the opportunity, and so on and so forth. Furthermore, he appeared to be appealing to white workers left behind both by the export of capital and the automation of production.

Indeed, A) Trump was openly running on racism (from his birtherism to his anti-Mexican xenophobia), B) he undertook what in hindsight was a brilliant and brilliantly executed strategy to develop a totally non-traditional base, for Repubs., in the white working class, his racism certainly appealing to some of them, and C) openly revealed a strong authoritarian streak.

Now that set of positions just happens to appeal to persons who believe that a particular English translation of the Bible, created by a committee of 52 scholars and theologians at the beginning of the 17th century for the English ruling class -- the "King James Version" -- somehow represents the "inerrant word of God." And not only that, that following its prescriptions, as interpreted by the true believers, of course, should be enforced on everyone else, by the use of the criminal law if necessary.

This theory of government places "God," as interpreted by certain persons, of course, above the Constitution. It is known as Reconstructionism/Dominionism." Among the prominent Republican Dominionists are the Vice-President-elect, Mike Pence, the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Dr. Ben Carson, and Sens. Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio. Nevertheless, Trump, even if not an obvious true believer himself, and apparently not a Dominionist (if for no other reason that being one would place God above himself) did appeal in one or another way to Republican Religious Fundamentalists.

The speed at which the volte face in terms of who and what the true Trumpite base is/are is being undertaken is quite remarkable. I will begin to deal with how the Left may be able to deal effectively with this ever-growing threat in my next column.

A version of this article appeared on The Greanville Post

Must Read 2   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Steven Jonas Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Steven Jonas, MD, MPH, MS is a Professor Emeritus of Preventive Medicine at StonyBrookMedicine (NY). As well as having been a regular political columnist on several national websites for over 20 years, he is the author/co-author/editor/co-editor of 37 books Currently, on the columns side, in addition to his position on OpEdNews as a Trusted Author, he is a regular contributor to From The G-Man.  In the past he has been a contributor to, among other publications, The Greanville PostThe Planetary Movement, and Buzzflash.com.  He was also a triathlete for 37 seasons, doing over 250 multi-sport races.  Among his 37 books (from the late 1970s, mainly in the health, sports, and health care organization fields) are, on politics: The 15% Solution: How the Republican Religious Right Took Control of the U.S., 1981-2022; A Futuristic Novel (originally published 1996; the 3rd version was published by Trepper & Katz Impact Books, Punto Press Publishing, 2013, Brewster, NY, sadly beginning to come true, advertised on OpEdNews and available on  (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Pope Francis and Change in the Roman Catholic Church

Limbaugh, Santorum, Sex, and the Origins of the Roman Catholic Church

The "Irrepressible Conflict" and the Coming Second Civil War

Gay Marriage and the Constitution

The Republican Party and the Separation of Church and State: Change Does Happen

What the Gunners Want: What's in Rick Perry's Pocket, Unlimited

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend