190 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 41 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H1'ed 1/22/16

The Obama Biden "Cancer Moonshot" Project Must Include Bottom-up Approaches

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   15 comments
Author 1
Editor-in-Chief

Rob Kall
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Rob Kall
Become a Fan
  (295 fans)

Cancer
Cancer
(Image by Counse)
  Details   DMCA

The idea of taking a "moonshot" approach to addressing cancer has great potential. Cancer is, after heart disease, the biggest killer and one of the most costly diseases. But if the project is to be successful there are political currents to navigate and the Obama's history in those currents is quite checkered.

When Obama talks about a cancer cure, it is likely that he is referring to the standard medical model approach-- a top-down cure-- a wonder drug, vaccine, or maybe a complex chemo/drug/radiation treatment delivered by heroic, super-doctors and scientists from top institutions. . These are top down because of they way they are developed and implemented-- dispensed by people higher in the hierarchy to passive recipients.

It would be sad, frustrating, perhaps disingenuous, outrageous, and yet, expected if this project totally ignored the bottom-up approach to cancer.

Bottom-up approaches to cancer work to reduce carcinogenic, "upstream" factors in the environment-- water, air, food-- and carcinogenic behaviors. There's are a few more aspect to looking at cancer from a bottom-up perspective. It is primarily a preventive approach. Much of the approach involves stopping doing things-- dumping chemicals into the water supply, allowing and including additives to food, avoiding eating processed foods, animal products and foods that have many additives in them. And let's not forget other carcinogenic sources-- radioactivity, energy radiation, like that found in mobile phones and who knows where else. It's a combination of stopping certain business practices and stopping certain behaviors-- particularly eating the wrong foods. Tapping the power of the immune system can also be a bottom-up approach, especially if it is done with diet, psychology, exercise and natural approaches.

This bottom-up aspect of cancer is where the political currents run deep. There are deep corporate pockets that have been lobbying for decades to prevent the FDA from even finding out what chemicals and food additives are carcinogenic. Who knows what effects burning fossil fuels by the billions of tons has on cancer? We're starting to see evidence that radio-frequency and electromagnetic radiation from mobile phones and maybe from cell towers can cause some cancers, as well as neurological problems.

When it comes to food there are so many chemicals used to grow plants and animals and already we know some of them are carcinogenic. Glyphosates-- Monsanto's Round-up, for example-- and the UN has stated that they are likely carcinogens.

If Obama and Biden really aim to cure cancer the place to start is the identification of sources and causes of cancer. The problem is, the cancer treatment business is big-- it will reach close to $160 billion a year by 2020, and that's just the cost for outpatient treatment, drugs and hospital fees. Some pharmaceutical companies are charging $200,000+ for a course of treatment. There's a lot of profit in cancer. That could drive costs even higher. And Obama has a history of appointing executives and attorneys from those business in high government positions of power.

I'm not saying Obama and Biden are aiming to build new profit centers for the cancer business. But if they are serious about really curing cancer, they MUST address the root causes. Anything less and they will be selling out to the lobbies that profit from carcinogenic business practices-- pollution, additives, radiation, etc. Unfortunately, Obama's history is pretty bad. Still, Joe Biden has his heart in it, what with the loss of his son to cancer. He might do the right thing and address both top-down and bottom-up approaches to dealing with cancer.

I propose that an independent team composed of scientists, health care experts, and experts in food, toxic additives, agrochemicals, different forms of radiation. The team should also include consumer activists-- to keep an eye to be sure that the experts are clean-- no past history or current funding by potential companies that engage carcinogen related businesses which extract profits through sale or use of carcinogens.

It might be easier to spend $100 billion or more on top-down approaches than it is to move politicians to take the bottom-up approaches that could eliminate the causes in the first place.

Must Read 4   Well Said 4   Valuable 3  
Rate It | View Ratings

Rob Kall Social Media Pages: Facebook Page       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Rob Kall is an award winning journalist, inventor, software architect, connector and visionary. His work and his writing have been featured in the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, CNN, ABC, the HuffingtonPost, Success, Discover and other media.

Check out his platform at RobKall.com

He is the author of The Bottom-up Revolution; Mastering the Emerging World of Connectivity

He's given talks and workshops to Fortune 500 execs and national medical and psychological organizations, and pioneered first-of-their-kind conferences in Positive Psychology, Brain Science and Story. He hosts some of the world's smartest, most interesting and powerful people on his Bottom Up Radio Show, and founded and publishes one of the top Google- ranked progressive news and opinion sites, OpEdNews.com

more detailed bio:

Rob Kall has spent his adult life as an awakener and empowerer-- first in the field of biofeedback, inventing products, developing software and a music recording label, MuPsych, within the company he founded in 1978-- Futurehealth, and founding, organizing and running 3 conferences: Winter Brain, on Neurofeedback and consciousness, Optimal Functioning and Positive Psychology (a pioneer in the field of Positive Psychology, first presenting workshops on it in 1985) and Storycon Summit Meeting on the Art Science and Application of Story-- each the first of their kind. Then, when he found the process of raising people's consciousness (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

A Conspiracy Conspiracy Theory

Debunking Hillary's Specious Winning the Popular Vote Claim

Terrifying Video: "I Don't Need a Warrant, Ma'am, Under Federal Law"

Ray McGovern Discusses Brutal Arrest at Secretary Clinton's Internet Freedom Speech

Hillary's Disingenuous Claim That She's Won 2.5 Million More Votes is Bogus. Here's why

Cindy Sheehan Bugged in Denver

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend