Power of Story Send a Tweet        
- Advertisement -

Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 1 Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (2 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   No comments
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

The Late Great Tax Debate

By       Message John Sanchez Jr.       (Page 1 of 6 pages)     Permalink

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 2   Must Read 1   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 9/16/10

Author 8393
Become a Fan
  (45 fans)
- Advertisement -

We have embarked upon a debate over how to handle the looming prospect of George W. Bush's cuts to marginal tax rates being sunsetted as of December 31, 2010. This debate, like all debates, has two opposed arguments. There is the Democratic Party's argument that goes unarticulated, and there is the Republican Party's argument that is made up from whole cloth and designed to deceive.

- Advertisement -

The Democratic argument, despite its dearth of publicity, is straightforward and easily explained. The Bush tax cuts are due to expire at the end of the year. Democrats wish to extend the tax cuts for Americans earning less than $250,000 per year. That would be 98% of American workers keeping that tax cut.

- Advertisement -

The Republican argument is somewhat more complex, as in, "Oh, what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive." I'll try to break it down, though.

Republican Claim #1: Any tax cuts that are not extended constitute an Obama tax increase. Actually, any tax cuts that are lost will be because Bush Republicans voted to allow it to happen. These tax cuts, that they don't think they have to pay for, were originally passed by what they have so recently maligned in the Senate by using the budget reconciliation rule. Since the bill was scored as a drain on the Treasury, it was, according to the rule, subject to a ten year sunset provision. That means that the tax breaks ending are an integral part of this Republican bill, so any "tax increase", if it must be labeled as such, would be a Republican tax increase.

- Advertisement -

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6


- Advertisement -

Well Said 2   Must Read 1   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It


I am a lifelong resident of the Chicago suburbs, with a several year hiatus to serve in the Navy when my Vietnam era draft notice turned up. I had been told that guys with last names like mine were among the preferred cannon fodder in the Army, so (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The "Social Security is a Ponzi Scheme" Hoax

How to Steal $2.5 Trillion

Regarding Boris Nemtsov

Wisconsin's Union Workers Have Always Paid 100% of the Cost of Their Benefits

Considering Edward Snowden

Republican Bipartisanship, a Union of Both of Their Faces