Late last month, Barclay's Bank, a multinational bank and financial institution based in the United Kingdom, admitted to regulators that it tried to manipulate something called "Libor" before and during the financial crisis in 2008. "Libor" is an acronym for London Inter b ank Offered Rate. It is a rate used as a benchmark for the cost of lending throughout the financial system, and it is also used as a reference rate for a wide range of financial products like car loans, adjustable-rate mortgages, student loans and credit cards.
The Libor is not based on an objective measure of the interest for bank-to-bank loans. It is the average of a daily poll of the Association's member banks, who give an estimate of the interest rate they think they would pay if they sought to borrow from another bank.
It is supposed to be the way the financial system assesses the overall health of the financial system, because if the banks being polled feel confident about the state of things, they report a low number, because they assume that if they had to borrow from another bank, their cost of borrowing would be low. If member banks feel a low degree of confidence in the financial system, they report a higher interest rate. And from that the Libor is calculated, affecting the interest rate on financial products around the globe.
What has emerged from the Barclay's Bank inquiry is evidence that banks may have in fact been deliberately manipulating Libor rates for years. The evidence so far is that one arm of a bank responding to the Libor poll would change their number based on what another
arm of the same bank wanted -- and that other arm could consist of the
bank's traders who make their money on whether the rate goes up or down.
This means that millions of consumers, investers and businesses have been paying the wrong interest rate. Or rather, they haven't been paying an interest rate that is set according to some legitimate benchmark. Instead they are paying a rate based on a gentlemen's agreement at financial institutions, a method that practically incentivizes those banks to game the system to maximize their profits.
And remember, the British Bankers Association, the group that is responsible for setting the rate, is not a government agency. It is just a trade group of big banks -- Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase and Deutsche Bank and others -- whose decisions on such a crucial number are not based on honest accounting or rules or regulatory oversight, but on a gentlemen's agreement of honesty.
We don't
know just how deep this scandal goes. But the fact is that if a
fundamental component of our financial system has been or is being
manipulated, we have the right to know about it. Banks are not above the
law and they should not be allowed to operate in secrecy, especially
when they have a history of taxpayer bailout and when we are forced to
rely on them to provide capital for economic growth.
Source
3
3
3
