The leader of North Korea, the real Kim Jong-il, took exception to a big screen portrayal of a plot on his life in June. In November, a major hack to Sony Pictures and Entertainment's computing systems was attributed to a mysterious cadre of hackers in North Korea. When major theater chains said they wouldn't carry the film, Sony had enough. The company cancelled release of the film.
The ensuing controversy publicized the film in ways Sony could only imagine. Then, President Obama weighed in endorsing the release of the film. The prospect of a huge payday plus official endorsement from the President contributed to Sony's revised decision. The company announced that The Interview would be available soon on cable or internet pay per view. In addition, Sony made the film available to a group of independent cinemas known as the Art House Convergence after the cinemas signed an open petition on Change.org.
Alamo Drafthouse Cinemas opened the film at its 18 cinema-restaurant locations throughout the country. I saw the film at Alamo's theater in Ashburn, Northern Virginia, near Washington, DC. I survived to do this review.
Excellent Movie - See it
The film isn't for everyone, particularly those who can't tolerate foul language, funny (hilarious at times) but very crude sexual and scatological humor, and an absurdist plot that has little redeeming value other than entertaining humor. Those looking for highly entertaining humor, a clever plot, and outstanding comedic performances will enjoy just about every minute.
Dave Skylark (James Franco) is perhaps the most superficial television interviewer of all time. The story opens with Dave interviewing Eminem (playing himself). In the midst of the interview, Eminem says, "When I say things about gay people, or people think my lyrics are homophobic - it's because I'm gay." As Skylark follows up, Aaron Rapaport (Seth Rogan), his ace producer, jumps for joy at the exclusive.
this coup, Rapaport receives a call from a North Korean diplomat who
invites Skylark to do an interview with supreme leader Kim Jong-il. This
coincides with stories about the North Korean nuclear threat to the
West Coast of the United States. After the interview is arranged, two
CIA agents, Lacey (Lizzy Caplan) and Botwin (Reese Alexander), solicit Skylark for a plot to assassinate Kim.
The stage is set for the interview and the calamitous action surrounding it. If you make it this far without being seriously offended, the balance of the film offers one laugh after another. The actors show that they find literally nothing too degrading or demeaning to get a laugh. Randall Park is absolutely brilliant as Kim as is Diana Bang as Sook, Kim's closest aid.
Randall Park as Kim Jong-il
(Image by The Interview screenshop - official site) Permission Details DMCA
(Image: Randall Park as Kim screenshot)
The dialog is clever and the cinematography excellent, largely because it is unobtrusive. In one scene, Skylark tells Sook, "Kim must die." Sook responds, "How many times can America make the same mistake." Franco's response: "As many times as it takes." In another scene, Kim shows Skylark his collection of vehicles, expensive cars plus a mint condition World War II Soviet tank. As Skylark marvels at the tank, Kim says, 'That was a gift to my father from Stalin." Skylark responds, "In my country we pronounce that Stallone."
Portraying the actual leader of North Korea, Kim Jong-il, with a character by the exact same name as a target for assassination pushes the edge of the entertainment envelope in a serious way. This is, no doubt, the source of North Korea's anger. Someone said, 'How would Americans react if someone made a movie about assassinating Obama." Americans would be extremely upset. Nevertheless, The Interview is made, released, and very much worth seeing. (Official trailer)
Hysteria surrounding North Korea attack narrative follows familiar pattern
The narrative of the massive hack of Sony Pictures and Entertainment's enterprise computing system followed a familiar pattern. The attack was announced. Shortly after the attack, an evildoer was blamed. Then, with the appropriate political frame, the jingoism began.
A LA Times headline broke the story on November 24: Hack at Sony Pictures shuts computer system. No culprit was named. Reporting focused on the volume of materials released. Based on the pervasive nature of the control by hackers, the LA Times suggested that hackers gained access "to login information for an IT administrator, then uses those credentials to sniff around the network."
By December 1, the Wall Street Journal ran a story that pointed to North Korea as the likely party behind the hack. The article used unattributed information from "people briefed on the investigation" as proof for the claim. This was an easy claim to make in view of North Korea's statements in June that the film's release would be an "act of war." By December 19, President Obama accused North Korea of cyber terrorism based on the FBI's conclusion that North Korea was behind the hack.
As it turns out, serious commentators are taking apart the North Korea did it theme in a convincing way. Risk Based Security began a chronology and analysis on December 5 that laid the foundation for questioning North Korea as the culprit. Kim Zetter's article in Wired on December 17 summarized emerging doubt: The Evidence that North Korea Hacked Sony is Flimsy. On December 18, blogger Marc Rogers offered a detailed explanation of Why the Sony hack is unlikely to be the work of North Korea.