36 online
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 101 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

The Great Unbinding Part 2

By       (Page 1 of 9 pages)   6 comments
Message Derryl Hermanutz
Become a Fan
  (51 fans)

The Great UnbindingPart 2

cast off chains
cast off chains
(Image by StooMathiesen)
  Details   DMCA

Monetary understanding is not new knowledge, though the knowledge seems to have been lost in recent decades. It may come as a surprise to people who associate him with neoliberalism, economic hitmen and IMF enforcers; but the "early" Milton Friedman understood money, and advocated intelligent and humane solutions to our bank-debt money system problems.

Like the two Karl Marxes, there are two Milton Friedmans. The early Karl Marx was a witty observer, analyst and critic of humanity and our institutions. "Money makes bedfellows of impossibilities", for example. His diagnoses were incisive. But after he hooked up with Engels to write the Communist Manifesto, his prescriptions became highly questionable.

So with Friedman, who learned money system mechanics as a student of Irving Fisher at the University of Chicago. Like Fisher himself, the early Friedman was a lucid advocate of radical monetary system reform. The later Friedman became the intellectual GodFather of The Chicago Boyz -- the young Latinos who were brainwashed with neoliberal 'privatization' religion, and who then returned to their home countries to unwittingly play the role of economic hitmen.

I'm not sure if the later Marx and the later Friedman actually "believed in" what they did. Neither Marx nor Friedman would be the first (or last) clear-eyed intellectuals who sold out to monied patrons, and applied their intellect to advancing their patron's less than transparent designs.

Nonetheless, the early Friedman understood money and knew how to fix it. Within a readable 15 pages, his 1948 paper, A Monetary and Fiscal Framework for Economic Stability, lays out the socially and economically beneficial -- and financially essential -- logic of monetary system reform. The Friedman paper is here,

click here

In the 1930s Irving Fisher -- who (like his contemporary but not collaborator CH Douglas) knew that bank-issued "credit-money" created almost all of the economy's spendable, investible, earnable, savable money supply; and knew that commercial banks exercise an absolute monopoly of credit-money issuance -- recognized that the world was in a "debt deflation depression".

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Must Read 6   Valuable 2   Well Said 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Derryl Hermanutz Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

I spent my working life as an independent small business owner/operator. My academic background is in philosophy and political economy. I began studying monetary systems and monetary history after the 1982 banking crash that was precipitated by (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Free Enterprise vs Corporatism

Banksters vs Humanity: Round 14

Size Matters: Local Democracy vs. Global Plutocracy

The Physics of Spirit

Economic Democracy vs Bankster Plutocracy

Corporations are not free market enterprises

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend