Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 3 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

The Fall of Shah of Iran

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     (# of views)   No comments
Author 8028
Message Mohammad Ala
- Advertisement -

Dr. Mohammad Mosaddegh had nationalized the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (AIOC) when it refused to be audited in early 1952-53 time frame. The refusal confirmed a suspicion that there had been gross exploitation of Iran's oil with only a small percentage (1%-%3) of AIOC's income going to Iran and the majority going to Britain.


(Image by Public)   Details   DMCA

At the request of the British government following pressures from AIOC's executives, with the help from CIA, staged demonstrations against Dr. Mosaddegh, his government was overthrown in 1953 paving the way for the Shah to return from exile.

- Advertisement -

In 2014-2015 time frame, a number of people who had read Iranian oil contracts and agreements have spoken that there were a possibility that the Iranian government during Shah's regime did not realize the term of the contracts was limited to the time while Shah or his regime (Pahlavi) remained in power. Possibly this error was due to the vagueness and ambiguity in the language of the western contracts with Iranian national oil company. Other possibilities are that the Iranian government during Shah believed that such provisions were standards in international contracting or that it did not foresee any threat to its existence.

Iran had invested its oil revenue in many western companies and projects (1960-1975), in some cases, approximately, 40% of these projects were Iranian owned. Yet Iran's share of these projects is now uncertain.

Whatever the reason(s), it is now clear that Western oil companies did obtain their shares and necessary funds and profits from contracts, and after observing a few years of political stability in Iran, they fostered regime change as a way to cancel the oil agreements to their advantage. This is what seems to have happened. Western countries always were in negotiations with the opposition whom they had created and financed in the Dr. Mosaddegh's time (1951-1953) and were waiting for another opportunity to arise (1976-1978) to cancel oil agreements while keeping the profits and Iran's investment shares in their organizations. (Iran had invested in many western companies such as Pan American Airlines and Britain's Water Department to name a few. These shares were basically confiscated after fall of Shah).

- Advertisement -

Looking over the Iran's history from the time when British army arrived in West Asia, they started causing anarchy including changing the name of the region to Middle East. Western countries should not be exempt from prosecution in international courts. However, the world and legal systems (including those of UN agencies) are run by the rule of force not any rule of law, especially for the weaker countries. It seems that there was nothing that could be done to force oil and gas companies into compliance of international norms and laws so powerful companies and countries kept doing what they wanted. The good news is that there are sufficient records to explore the crimes committed against Iranian people from a number of venues including international treaties and enactments.

What took place in western courts in 1980-1990 and even up to 2000 time frame against Iran's investments in western owned companies, it was not that I expected justice from the UK or US courts, but that an international tribunal might take an interest if those who are still alive or have a copy of oil contracts and agreements would present their existing evidences.

 

- Advertisement -

Well Said 2   News 1   Supported 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Mohammad Ala Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

I am a native of Iran, pronounced Eeran NOT Eye-ran.....> Hint: Italy: Eetaly not Eye-taly. Iran has been in the region properly termed 'West Asia' -- not the 'Middle East' for thousand of years. It is heart-warming to see (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Imperative of the Chicago Convention

Immigrants As Scapegoats

The USA and Iran: Strains and Illegal Sanctions

The Catastrophic Consequences of Oil

The Price of War Against Iran: 'Just Say No'

Lip Service to Human Rights: What Are the Causes?