Share on Google Plus 8 Share on Twitter 8 Share on Facebook 12 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest 1 Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 1 Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (31 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   6 comments
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

The Edible Source of Global Warming

By       Message moses seenarine     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H4 8/7/15

Author 502871
Become a Fan
  (2 fans)
From flickr.com/photos/121483302@N02/14013976368/: Cows
Cows
(Image by theglobalpanorama)
  Permission   Details   DMCA
- Advertisement -

- Advertisement -
The livestock sector plays an often unrecognized role in global warming. But even in the smallest estimate by the Food and Agriculture Organization of 14.5 percent of total manmade emissions, the livestock sector emits more greenhouse gas than the world's transport networks. Demand for animal products is projected to increase by 50 percent from 2013 to 2025, which will significantly expand animal-based emissions.

Animal agriculture specifically drives climate change, and is linked to increasing greenhouse gases (GHGs), the food crisis and water emergencies. Animal agribusiness has large footprints on the air, land, water, energy, material, health, and other areas. These various GHG footprints are part of livestock animals' life-cycle and byproducts' supply chains.

Alarmingly, livestock production's footprints include carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and other GHGs, that have a larger cumulative effect on climate change than from each gas added up individually. And unless livestock's emissions are reduced along with fossil fuels, they may set in motion various environmental feedbacks that result in the surpassing of climate change tipping points.

In reducing fossil-based emissions, an argument can be made that fossil fuels are not essential for human survival, and that many non-carbon sources of energy already exist, and should be used instead. However, this argument is often inverted when dealing with livestock's GHG emissions. Animal-based diets are viewed as non-negotiable and indispensable to human survival. And, the common perception is that other protein sources are not as good or available.

The lobbies for eggs, cow's milk and animal carcass production, are well-organized, and many politicians minimize and ignore the climate and diet issue due to conflicts of interest. For example, a European Parliament member minimized this issue by saying, "I don't believe that the world will come to an end because of cows burping and farting."

- Advertisement -

And, a senior member of the staff of the German Environment Minister admitted, "We have exempted agriculture from the climate protection strategy in order to limit the number of potential sources of conflict." The chairman of the German Advisory Council on the Environment was more explicit in stating, "No one dares to say that we ought to eat less meat and more plant-based protein."

In contrast, a World Bank study on the consumption of animal products and the risk of chronic diseases found that in many situations, the partial displacement of carbohydrate staple source of energy with animal products may have neutral or no beneficial health effect. Red meat consumption is on the rise globally, and it is associated with an increased risk of total, cardiovascular disease, and cancer mortality. In contrast, substitution of other healthy protein sources for red meat is associated with a lower mortality risk.

Similar to pollution from fossil fuels, animal-based diets cause many negative effects on human health and the environment. And, in turn, animal-based diet related illnesses and animal waste pollution generate huge amounts of CO2 emissions in health care and habitat restoration. Both fossil-based and animal-based emissions and pollution are huge problems, and regulations need to be used and strictly enforced in order to reduce risks to the environment and human health.

Reducing emissions from livestock could curb global warming fairly rapidly. By making our food system more efficient and by eating healthier food, we can reduce emissions from agriculture by up to 90 percent by 2030. That is the equivalent of removing all the cars in the world. Governments have used laws, regulations and other tools with great success to discourage smoking and other negative personal habits. Similarly, they can encourage citizens to eat a balanced diet for improved health and to help stop global warming.

Excerpt from the book, "Meat Climate Change," see http://meatclimatechange.org/

Dr. Moses Seenarine is a plant-based father and activist, founder of Climate Change 911, and the author of Voices from the Subaltern (2004), and Meat Climate Change (forthcoming).

- Advertisement -

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

http://tinyurl.com/jjedhcv

Dr. Moses Seenarine is a plant-based father and activist, founder of Climate Change 911, and the author of Voices from the Subaltern(2004) and Meat Climate Change (Available on Amazon)

Dr. Moses Seenarine completed an Ed.D in (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon



Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Edible Source of Global Warming

What Can Cecil Teach Us About Climate Change?

Soil Not Meat: Overgrazing, War and Climate Change

God's Climate: the Pope and His Doomed Encyclical

Lucky Streaks Don't Last: Livestock Disease and Human Health

Why a One-degree Rise in Global Temperature is a Big Deal