Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 2 Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
Life Arts

The Divine Right of KIngs

By       Message Hugh Colmer       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     Permalink    (# of views)   6 comments

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Author 502722
Become a Fan
  (1 fan)


The Divine Right of Kings
(Image by Hugh Colmer)
  Permission   Details   DMCA
- Advertisement -
/p>

This Sunday PBS introduced a new program, Tales from the Royal Wardrobe, Dr. Lucy Worsley, Chief Curator at Historic Royal Palaces, let us peek at the robes of British Kings and Queens. The choice of their robes apparently revealed a great deal about their reigns and how their' sartorial choices influenced the fashion of the day. Kings and queens needed an impressive collection of garments to display their power, Elizabeth I knew her robes would be seen around her own and other European courts as a representation of her power. The dress Elizabeth 1 st wore in the 'Rainbow Portrait', is embroidered with eyes and ears, a not-so-understated way for the royal court to know that their Virgin Queen is omniscient. After Charles 1 execution for abusing the Divine Right of Kings the later Stuart kings sought to regain the public's approval through their dress. Today as in the past, royal fashion is as much about politics as it is about elegant attire and the Divine Right of Kings is rarely discussed.

When the Stuart King James VI of Scotland ascended the throne of England to become King James I of Great Britain, he made a speech that shocked his nobles in Parliament. They had been attempting to limit the powers of the crown to strengthen their own. What upset them was that James used his coronation speech to remind them of the ancient tradition that a monarch is chosen by God to be His representative on Earth, and therefore responsible to no When the Stuart King James VI of Scotland ascended the throne of England to become King James I of Great Britain, he made a speech that shocked his nobles in Parliament. They had been attempting to limit the powers of the crown to strengthen their own. What upset them was that James used his coronation speech to remind them of the ancient tradition that a monarch is chosen by God to be His representative on Earth, and therefore responsible to no one but God. Therefore James was asserting, much to the MP's dismay, 'The Divine Right of Kings'.

The Divine Right practiced by European monarchs was an ancient practice of the monarchs of Judah and Israel. Many European royal families considered them to be their ancestors, tracing their royal European lineage back to the Jewish King David, sometimes through the descendants of Jesus Christ. Such a line of descent was (and is) known as the "Grail Bloodline".

- Advertisement -


The Basilica
(Image by Hugh Colmer)
  Permission   Details   DMCA

Originally, a pharaoh or king was the 'Anointed' of Yahweh. The Pharaohs were anointed with Messeh, (dragon Oil) from which we derive the term 'Messiah.' At his anointing (or his coronation), the Spirit of Yahweh entered the king, giving him phenomenal qualities and allowing him to carry out the commands of the god. Yahweh supposedly said, 'You are my son - today I have sired you.'' Thus, the king was adopted by Yahweh at his coronation and, closer to him than his courtiers. On many occasions, Yahweh was called the king's god and this power to anoint kings was usurped by the Vatican.

- Advertisement -

The imperial power of the Vatican to create kings by 'coronation' derived from a falsified 8th century 'Donation of Constantine' which was not revealed to be a forgery until 1440. In that year Lorenzo Valla published his Discourse on the Forgery of the Alleged Donation of Constantine, in which he enumerated the large number of historical anachronisms that pervaded the work. This allowed several hundred years for the Archbishops of the Church of England with the support of the Catholic Tudors themselves to crown their kings. When he split with Rome, Henry VIII endorsed the Anglo-Catholic Church of England rite to create by coronation, a succession of British monarchs. As the 'Donation of Constantine' was proved to be a totally fake document the Royal Dragon Houses of Europe didn't recognize a Christian British monarchy,

Because the Donation was a fraud no Catholic Archbishop has had the right to crown kings, Britain hasn't had a legal reigning monarch for 900 years. As a consequence all the laws passed by these monarchs were and are illegal and worthless and all the governmental agencies set up by these monarchs or their laws are also illegal up to the present day. We can see from the Church's choice of 'Constantine' that the Church was well aware that only those of the Dragon Blood would be recognized as true kings. Therefore they chose Constantine as he was known to have been descended from both the Britannic Pendragon House and the Dragon House of David. No doubt the Merovingian kings also knew this to be a fraud, which is why they refused to recognize the authority of the Church to interfere in their affairs of state and were nearly wiped out in the dark ages.

Acknowledged alternative history expert Tracy Twyman's interview with the late Prince Nicholas De Vere, are the source of inspiration for this article. De Vere stated that we have been conned enough. His hope is we might appreciate the full extent the religious enslavement that has robbed us of knowing who we really are for over a thousand years. The entire moral basis of our society is founded upon a huge deception that has warped the minds of generations who've been indoctrinated that their natural drives are unnatural. This form of prohibition probably caused the prohibition against alcohol and the root of the duality between the races running rampant today. Religion and politics are the problem, They have taught us to resist Satan, the Anti-Christ, temptation and sin, things which De Vere, like U.G. Krishnamurti, believed never existed in the first place.

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Hugh Colmer is a Mythbuster. He discovered his own path after experiencing many other paths. During Hugh's examination of myth and religion, he realized that the Red Cross and the Circle symbolized the "Cup of the Blood", the Holy Grail, the (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Thor's Day

Omni-Conscience

Sunday: The Day of the Dragon

Return of the Goddess

Constant Integrated Awareness: The Solution to Planetary Destruction

Saturns Day