Power of Story Send a Tweet        
OpEdNews Op Eds

The "Courtpocalypse" and How to Delay It

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Thomas Knapp       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     Permalink

Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags  Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 2/17/16

Author 76576

US Supreme Court
US Supreme Court
(Image by Wikipedia (commons.wikimedia.org))
  Permission   Details   DMCA
- Advertisement -


Presidential election campaigns tend to follow a predictable issues timetable, but certain events can upset that timetable in a big way. The death of US Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia is precisely such an event, and its consequences will be felt in November.


- Advertisement -

By the time Scalia's body reached the funeral home, US Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) had already handed Democrats a great talking point and turnout motivator with his announcement that he intends to put off Senate confirmation of any replacement for Scalia for a full year, until a new president has been elected and sworn in.


The usual tactical approach when a president of one party nominates a candidate for approval by a Senate of the other party is basically brute obstructionism -- dragging out the committee investigations, perhaps pushing back with the discovery or manufacture of scandals, and so on. McConnell could have almost certainly pulled that off. There would have been grumbling, but heck, there's always grumbling.

- Advertisement -


Alternatively, a "consensus" appointee acceptable to both sides of the aisle might be allowed to run the gauntlet. In this case, the likely pick would be DC Court of Appeals judge Srikanth Srinivasan, who clerked for "conservative" justice Sandra Day O'Connor, worked in the Solicitor General's office during the Bush administration, and was confirmed by a 97-0 Senate vote when Obama appointed him to his current post.


Instead, McConnell laid out an entirely new doctrine: When the Senate doesn't like the sitting president, he says, it will just hold off on confirming Supreme Court appointments until it gets a president it DOES like.


Why is that such a big deal? Because the implications stretch far beyond the replacement of Scalia.

- Advertisement -


At least three more SCOTUS justices -- Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Anthony Kennedy and Stephen Breyer -- are, as was Scalia, in their late 70s or early 80s. Along with Scalia, they cover the whole range from "liberal" to "conservative." And like Scalia, there's every reason to believe that they will each retire or die during the next presidential term.


Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Thomas L. Knapp is director and senior news analyst at the William Lloyd Garrison Center for Libertarian Advocacy Journalism (thegarrisoncenter.org). He lives and works in north central Florida.


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Finally, Evidence of Russian Election Meddling ... Oh, Wait

Chickenhawk Donald: A Complete and Total Disgrace

The Nunes Memo Only Partially "Vindicates" Trump, But it Fully Indicts the FBI and the FISA Court

NATO: This Deal is a Turkey

There She Goes Again: Clinton's Blame Game

US Foreign Military Bases Aren't "Defense"