47 online
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 26 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H1'ed 1/7/16

The Best, Most Effective Way to Stem This Rising Tide of Terrorism

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   17 comments
Message Michael Payne

As terrorism rears its ugly head in the world, the U.S. and its Western allies react to these increasing acts of terror by taking swift action against those suspected of committing them. While that's the appropriate response, it's like applying band aids to a grievous wound; it's not going to stop the continued bleeding.

When one encounters a very serious and escalating problem such as this spreading of terrorism throughout the world it's imperative that the root cause be identified in order to develop the solutions to bring it under control. That's simply not being done by the leaders of these Western nations. And, as a result, the terrorists are gaining the upper hand and taking the initiative in planning more attacks on their primary targets, the U.S. and their allies.

The reality of the situation is that terrorism can never be completely eliminated. It's been a part of life on this planet almost from the beginning of time and it will exist in one form or another as long as humans inhabit the earth. But if we do not come up with the ways to bring this current situation under control we will find ourselves living in a chaotic world filled with constant fear and paranoia.

Terrorism can be found in many regions and countries but the terrorism that poses the greatest threat is currently concentrated in the Middle East and North Africa, both of which have large Muslim populations.

Because of that fact it's extremely important that these Western governments and their leaders fully comprehend that Muslims, other religious groups, or other societal factions all have their dangerous, rogue elements. So in the process of planning appropriate responses to this monumental problem they must make certain that the people of the Muslim faith, collectively, are not singled out as the main cause of this overall problem; that they do not make the mistake of promoting guilt by association; that will prove to be very counterproductive.

This wave of terrorism is largely the product of deep seated anger and associated hatred that has been building up for decades because of many of the aggressive actions taken against them by various U.S. governments, often supported by their Western allies; actions that have overthrown governments, deposed leaders, including dictators, installed new ones, and interfered in the internal affairs of nations. This has included invasions and occupations and the conducting of bombing campaigns in nations such as Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and now Syria.

That statement is not supposition, that's documented fact. Not only that but we are currently witnessing some of these same nations engaging in actions in Syria that could be referred to as throwing more gasoline on a raging fire.

So what should the U.S. and its allies do to defuse this highly dangerous situation? Should they ramp up their military force across this entire region and try to establish a suffocating control over the Muslim nations and their people?

Absolutely not; to keep following an agenda that is clearly not working and actually backfiring would be an exercise in futility and a colossal mistake. What they must do instead is to finally acknowledge that this highly faulted strategy is never going to work. It's time to think much more deeply and dramatically change course.

The U.S. and Western nations should, as soon as it is feasible, remove their military forces from Middle Eastern and North African countries; that is, all the forces which are not there at the specific invitation of the host sovereign nations. In other words they need to remove their militaries out of countries where they don't belong and where they have no legal right to be according to international law.

One of the only exceptions to this rule would be the nation of Qatar which willingly allows the U.S. Central Command headquarters to maintain a presence at this country's Al Udeid Air Base.

The first country for the U.S. and their allies to exit is Syria. Stop all the bombing immediately and then pack up and leave.

But wait; there are those who will say that they must stay there to fight ISIS and its associated terrorist groups. No, that is not the case; in fact, it's not a secret that the primary objective of the U.S. government has been to remove President Assad of Syria from power. But to continue to concentrate on removing Assad would be following the same misguided strategy that removed Muammar Gaddafi of Libya and Saddam Hussein of Iraq from power; and then which left those countries in a state of chaos and disarray; and generated a massive amount of anger and hatred in the hearts of the people that came under attack.

No, removing Assad is not the answer; the chances that it would be successful are very poor at best, and here's why. Russia entered that conflict at the invitation of Assad and has established a powerful military presence in Syria and, along with Iranian and Hezbollah troops on the ground, is mounting a massive attack on ISIS to destroy it and prevent the removal of Assad. Russia is not going to step aside, so it's very likely that Assad is going to remain in power.

Now, besides Syria, U.S. military actions have involved the use of drones to launch Hellfire missiles into the countries of Pakistan, Somalia and Yemen with the intent of destroying terrorists. In far too many instances these missiles have, instead, killed innocent civilians. These drone attacks have accomplished little more than stoking the fires of anger and hatred and the creation of more revenge seekers. Therefore, the next step to reduce the degree of terrorism is to completely halt these drone incursions into those specific countries.

Following this strategy does not mean that the U.S. should not have some form of military presence anywhere in the Middle East and surrounding regions. That can be done with the presence of substantial naval power. But what we need to see is the end of the unjustified invasions, occupations and interference in internal affairs. U.S. leaders would do well to adopt the wise strategy of President Theodore Roosevelt and his "Speak softly and carry a big stick" policy. Make war an absolute last resort and only when America is directly threatened should such action follow.

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Well Said 2   Supported 2   Must Read 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Michael Payne Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact EditorContact Editor
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Orwell's "1984" becoming a reality in modern-day America

Heed the Warning Signs; America is Edging Ever Closer to a Societal Implosion

Ethics and Morals in America; an Endangered Species

How Do You Spell Sociopath? G-O-P

The Beginning of the End for the U.S. Dollar as the World Reserve Currency

A U.S. President Defies Congress, the Constitution and the Will of the People; Will Impeachment Follow?

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend