Power of Story Send a Tweet        

Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 1 Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (2 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   2 comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

Target Russia. Target China. Target Iran

By       Message Pepe Escobar       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     Permalink

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags  Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 2   News 1   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 5/31/16

Author 73066
Become a Fan
  (178 fans)
- Advertisement -

Reprinted from Strategic Culture


(Image by Strategic Culture)   Permission   Details   DMCA

Not a day goes by without US Think Tankland doing what it does best; pushing all sorts of scenarios for cold -- and hot -- war with Russia, plus myriad confrontations with China and Iran.

- Advertisement -

That fits into the Pentagon's Top Five existential threats to the US, where Russia and China sit at the very top and Iran is in fourth place -- all ahead of terrorism of the phony Daesh Caliphate variety.

Here I have come up with some concise realpolitik facts to counterpunch the hysteria -- stressing how the Russian hypersonic missile advantage renders useless the whole construct of NATO's paranoid rhetoric and bluster.

The US Aegis defense system has been transferred from ships to land. The Patriot missile defense system is worthless. Aegis is about 30% better than the THAAD system; it may be more effective but their range is also limited.

- Advertisement -

Aegis is not a threat at all to Russia -- for now. Yet as the system is upgraded -- and that may take years -- it could cause Russia some serious concern, as Exceptionalistan is increasingly pushing them eastward, so near to Russia's borders.

Anyway, Russia is still light-years ahead in hypersonic missiles. The Pentagon knows that against the S-500 system, the F-22, the awesomely expensive F-35 and the B-2 stealth airplanes -- stars of a trillion-dollar fighter program -- are totally obsolete.

So it's back to the same old meme: Russian aggression, without which the Pentagon cannot possibly fight for its divine right to be showered with unlimited funds.

Washington had 20,000 planners at work before WWII was ended, focused on the reconstruction of Germany. Washington had only six after the destruction of Iraq in 2003's Shock and Awe.

That was no incompetence; it was Plan A from the get-go. The former USSR was deemed a mighty threat at the end of WWII -- so Germany had to be rebuilt. Iraq was a war of choice to grab oil fields -- mixed with the implementation of hardcore disaster capitalism. No one in Washington ever cared or even wanted to rebuild it.

Russian aggression does not apply to Iraq; it's all about Eastern Europe. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov anyway has made it clear that the deployment of the Aegis will be counterpunched in style -- as even US corporate media starts to admit that the Russian economy is healing from the effects of the oil price war.

- Advertisement -

Take a look at my liquid asssets

Here my purpose was to show that China is not a House of Cards. Whatever the real Chinese debt to GDP ratio -- figures vary from as low as 23% to 220% -- that is nothing for an economy the size of the Chinese, especially because it is entirely internally controlled.

China keeps over $3 trillion in US dollars and other Western currencies in reserves while it gradually delinks its economy from the real House of Cards: the US dollar economy.

So under these circumstances what does foreign debt mean? Not much. China could -- although they don't do it yet -- produce more yuan and buy back their debt, as much as the US with quantitative easing (QE) and the European Central Bank (ECB) as it asks certain "favorite countries" (strong NATO supporters) to produce more than their share of euros.

And yet Beijing doesn't really need to do this. China, Russia, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) and what's left of the BRICS (Brazil is on hold until at least 2018) are slowly but surely forging their own internal currency and currency transfer system (in China and Russia it works already internally) to sideline SWIFT and the Bank of International Settlements (BIS).

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

Well Said 2   News 1   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Pepe Escobar is an independent geopolitical analyst. He writes for RT, Sputnik and TomDispatch, and is a frequent contributor to websites and radio and TV shows ranging from the US to East Asia. He is the former roving correspondent for Asia (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Why Putin is driving Washington nuts

You Want War? Russia is Ready for War

Why Qatar wants to invade Syria

All aboard the New Silk Road(s)

It was Putin's missile?

Where is Prince Bandar?