Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 2 Share on Facebook 3 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 1 Share on StumbleUpon 1 Tell A Friend (7 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   1 comment
General News

Tar Sands Oil Arkansas #2 (an update, almost all new)

By       Message William Boardman     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 10 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

News 1   Supported 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 4/11/13

Author 14586
Become a Fan
  (30 fans)

The Press and Public Are Contained, Even if the Tar Sands Oil Isn't 

 

By William Boardman  

 


ExxonMobil's Pegasus.
(Image by ExxonMobil)
  Permission   Details   DMCA

Reader Supported News   is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to  Reader Supported News

 

[NOTE: As of April 11, ExxonMobil is still working to control all news from the Mayflower tar sands oil spill.  Independent reporting is difficult if not impossible.]  

 

The first "Tar Sands Oil Arkansas" [1](on April 7)[1] discussed a number of questions raised by the  ExxonMobil Pegasus pipeline that burst in Mayflower, Arkansas, on March 29, pumping tar sands oil -- technically Wabasca Heavy crude oil -- into a residential neighborhood for almost an hour.

 

Among the questions touched on in that piece were protecting the pipeline from terrorists, residents suing ExxonMobil in federal court, the nature of Wabasca Heavy tar sands oil, some effects of the spill, and the "martial law" atmosphere described by reporters trying to look at the cleanup site. 

 

As the second week of toxic air in Mayflower begins, here are some more of the questions it raises and some of the current answers, subject to future refinement.   A reader writes:

 

What is the point of origin of the leak? In front of whose house? Why no image of the hole in the ground or in the pipe? Was it corrosion, a weld failure, sabotage by cutting or explosives, or WHAT? Do we have to wait for NTSB for answers? Is Exxon Mobil and their execs too big to jail?

 

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10

 

- Advertisement -

News 1   Supported 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Vermonter living in Woodstock: elected to five terms (served 20 years) as side judge (sitting in Superior, Family, and Small Claims Courts); public radio producer, "The Panther Program" -- nationally distributed, three albums (at CD Baby), some (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon



Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Nuclear Perceptions Fight Reality

Fukushima Spiking All of a Sudden

Fukushima Meltdowns: Global Denial At Work

Vermont Asks: "What the Fukushima"?

Military-Industrial Complex Owns Vermont

Accountability in Vermont?