When Hilary Benn the Shadow (official opposition party) Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs sat down after his barnstorming speech to the British House of Commons on Wednesday, 2nd December 2015, the Government Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs (Philip Hammond) replied "I congratulate the right hon. Member for Leeds Central (Hilary Benn) on an outstanding exposition of the case for the motion. It will go down as one of the truly great speeches made in the House of Commons."
Well, if that is what we call a great speech, the state of our democracy is truly lamentable. Benn displayed no understanding of the nature of the situation in Syria/Iraq to which he referred. The simplifications he used to describe that situation pandered to the worst kind of knee jerk reaction possible.
Hilary Benn addressed Parliament. Labour Leader Jeremy Corbyn to his right
His "analysis" proceeded from this statement:
In amassing information to help him answer his own question he was quite happy to play fast and loose with the truth as when he stated
"Daesh has killed 30 British tourists in Tunisia", when it is generally acknowledged that it was the North African Al Qaeda that committed this atrocity.
To counter the argument that there will be civilian casualties he cites good intentions as a defense:
"I share the concerns that have been expressed this evening about potential civilian casualties. However, unlike Daesh, none of us today acts with the intent to harm civilians".
I wonder if the resulting innocent dead and injured will take comfort from our well meaning bombs?
His analysis of the foe is crude, resorting to the overused label 'fascists' as if that might clarify anything.
"We are faced by fascists--not just their calculated brutality, but their belief that they are superior to every single one of us".
He makes no attempt to address the current complexity of the situation completely ignoring the Russian bombing campaign carried out in conjunction with the Syrian President, Assad. His message is simplistic in the extreme. They are fascists. Let's bomb the hell out of them.
Benn is not alone in creating ISIS as a kind of metaphysical monster that happens to have come to dwell amongst us. By that I mean that ISIS is seen as representing some terrible incomprehensible force that has emerged to confront us like a biblical plague. It is apocryphal coming from some deep well in human nature that we cannot address with rationality but must respond with all the brutality that it itself embodies.
Why are we so incapable of standing back and trying to understand the thing we feel so threatened by? The answer to this question, Mr Benn, really is as simple as you obviously like things to be. The answer is that we have created and are creating the monster of ISIS ourselves. There is nothing like guilt, that you don't want to acknowledge, to distort your vision and cause you to lash out uncontrollably..
As Benn's colleague and party leader, Jeremy Corbyn, has said, ISIS is being funded from somewhere. It sells some oil, probably mostly to Turkey and Israel, but this would not be enough to sustain its forces and activities. Some state in the region is giving it money on a massive scale. The obvious candidate is our close friend and ally, our vital trading partner whereby we exchange hi-tech arms for oil, not to mention, the intimate friend of our very own monarch who publicly mourns the deaths of its head chopping, hand chopping kings. There are not many "usual suspects" for the role of funding ISIS and top of that list has to be Saudi Arabia.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).