77 online
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 14 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 3/5/16

Solving Energy Supply Problems In One Sentence

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   2 comments
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Richard Turcotte
Become a Fan
  (5 fans)
Determined to preserve the primacy of fossil fuels to power us in the future.
Determined to preserve the primacy of fossil fuels to power us in the future.
(Image by Gellscom)
  Details   DMCA

As is still the case--unfortunately, for all of us--a large contingent of individuals, organizations, and other associations remain determined at all costs [literally] to preserve the primacy of fossil fuels to power us into the future. Facts: good when they can be massaged to fit the partial-truth narrative required to breathe life into an industry unwilling to bend to the realities of geology, economics, and ... well, reality. Facts: not good when they address the broad range of issues and concerns best left neglected to further that Abundance-No Worries narrative.

One-sentence talking points seem to be the ideal. No concerns about having to delve into the complexities of ideologically troublesome issues, for one thing. Summary statements suggest there are no worries, for another. It's almost standard practice now for the comedians pretending to be serious about serving as GOP presidential candidates to offer feel-good content-free narratives to supporters whom they clearly do not respect. It's been the standard MO for a majority of GOP officials for a number of years now. It's also been standard MO for fossil fuel-industry cheerleaders as well.

It certainly serves some group's best interests, of course. Unfortunately, the general public is not that group.

As for the harm caused by failing to properly inform those relying upon the assessments of those others presumed to know? Who has the time to explain all those facts and details and what-nots?

According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, in 1998, when the article was written, global oil production was 75.7 million bbl/day. In 2014 it was 93.2, and our problem is too much oil.
It's useful to remember such things when the 'experts' grandly tell us what's going to happen.

With the world awash in oil and prices falling toward $26 a barrel, Iran is set to add to the oversupply now that international sanctions have been eased.
It's as if the whole world were conspiring to bury the tattered remains of the 'peak oil' thesis, so popular a few years ago.

I'm one the ten worst sources for explaining economics, but I do understand that when oil prices are as other-worldly low as they are now, few in the oil industry are eager to venture out and invest in production efforts they can ill-afford. Those production efforts are now more costly, more time-consuming, and fraught with a host of other challenges rarely encountered in the good-'ol days of conventional crude oil production. [If you don't have to explain any of the important facts regarding those highly-touted current production totals, it's so much easier to let a simplistic statement serve as the sum total of one's contention.]

So when the industry cannot afford to explore and extract because investors and lenders cannot justify the funding risks [and assuming the Happy Talkers have not discovered the right magic words to magically extract unconventional fossil-fuel supplies from deep below the planet's surface], then there will be inadequate production going forward.

And when there is inadequate production going forward, those vast abundances of worry-free fossil-fuel resources will stay tucked away deep below the planet's surface. Rising prices will certainly revive efforts, but those are not overnight undertakings, nor will they be free. And meanwhile, the finite fossil-fuel supply totals in conventional crude-oil fields will continue to do what finite resources do when they are extracted and used: they will decline.

When you have less of something today because you used some yesterday, and you cannot replace what you used, well ... economic theory isn't even necessary. Just garden-variety second-grade math.

So why is it so difficult for industry cheerleaders to acknowledge basic realities and provide an actual beneficial service to those relying on their presumed knowledge? If there is some consequence-free pill they are holding in abeyance, now might be a good time to start flooding the market with it.

Otherwise, those annoying facts are going to continue to mess with the Happy Talk. Offering the public the full range of issues for consideration and planning may violate some ideological code of honor, but countless millions might benefit even just a wee bit by having the full story about the challenges ahead.

Being "awash in oil" [points scored for using a favorite buzzword!] in the midst of falling prices isn't exactly ideal, once you move on to a second and third sentence.

Companies that grew quickly thanks to the shale boom are trying to weather the dramatic slide in oil prices with measures like scaling back production and laying off workers. But for many, sunk costs and high debt levels mean cutbacks are not enough.
As a result, defaults and bankruptcies are mounting in the U.S. energy industry as the price of crude bounces along under $30 a barrel amid a worldwide oil glut. And with some forecasts pointing to oil -- already down more than 70% since mid-2014 -- possibly falling below $20 a barrel, failures are expected to continue. What's more, plummeting energy prices have been a large contributor to the huge slide in global stock markets now underway.

Cherry-picking a few of the many relevant facts saves time and effort, of course. But strategies which clearly leave the public woefully under-informed have short shelf-lives, and offer up a long trail of unnecessary harm to follow.

Adapted from a recent blog post of mine.
Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Richard Turcotte Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Looking Left and Right: Inspiring Different Ideas, Envisioning Better Tomorrows I remain a firm believer in late U.S. Senator Paul Wellstone's observation that "We all do better when we all do better." That objective might be worth pursuing (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Peak Oil: Thinking Ahead

Peak Oil: Another Challenge

Decision-Making Shortcuts

Peak Oil: A Few Basics

Left v. Right Pt 9


To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend