Power of Story Send a Tweet        
- Advertisement -
General News

Siegelman Seeks Reversal Based on Ruling in Skilling Case

By       Message Roger Shuler     Permalink

Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags  Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Author 13717
- Advertisement -


Cross Posted atLegal Schnauzer


- Advertisement -

Former Alabama Governor Don Siegelman is asking a federal appeals court toreverse convictions against him, based on the U.S. Supreme Court's recent ruling that narrowed honest-services fraud law.


Siegelman and codefendant Richard Scrushy say the U.S. 11th Circuit Court of Appeals should overturn their convictions because of the Supreme Court's findings ina case involving former Enron executive Jeffrey Skilling. Attorneys for Siegelman and Scrushy filed briefs with the 11th Circuit yesterday.

- Advertisement -


Sam Heldman, a Washington, D.C.-based attorney, saidrevisions in honest-services lawrequire a reversal in the Siegelman case:


In June, the Supreme Court of the United States told the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals to consider Governor Siegelman's appeal again, with guidance from the Supreme Court's new decision in Skilling v. United States.


Today, Governor Siegelman filed his brief with the Eleventh Circuit, explaining that under the Skilling decision, all charges against Governor Siegelman should be dismissed.

- Advertisement -


One issue, Heldman said, is that the jury was tainted by instructions on a law that the Supreme Court now has held was unconstitutionally vague:


Most of the case against Governor Siegelman is based on the law that the Supreme Court addressed in Skilling, the so-called "honest services" law. The Supreme Court held in Skilling that the reach of that law is much narrower than prosecutors had long believed. It covers only true bribery and kickback cases. Governor Siegelman's case is not a bribery case. It is purely a case about lawful contributions to the lottery campaign, not a case about bribery. Governor Siegelman did not get a penny from those campaign contributions for himself. Under Skilling, there simply was no crime.


This leaves only two charges against Governor Siegelman, under laws other than the "honest services" statute. But Skilling requires dismissal of those charges as well. In charging Governor Siegelman under those other laws, the prosecutors in this case have tried to expand those laws beyond the words that Congress wrote. The Supreme Court in Skilling emphasized that in our system, criminal laws must be carefully written to give notice in advance of what is prohibited, and that prosecutors cannot stretch the laws to cover the prosecutors' chosen targets. Here again, Governor Siegelman simply did not break any laws.


 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

I live in Birmingham, Alabama, and work in higher education. I became interested in justice-related issues after experiencing gross judicial corruption in Alabama state courts. This corruption has a strong political component. The corrupt judges are (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Boy Scouts and the Horrors of Their "Perversion Files"

Bush vs. Obama on Spending: It's No Contest

Why Is Karl Rove Planning to Visit the Backwoods of Alabama?

What's the Real Story Behind Karl Rove's Divorce?

Is "Morning Joe" Scarborough a Murderer?

Rove Might Be Trying To "Pull A Siegelman" With Julian Assange