Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (1 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   3 comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

Sheep Led to the Slaughter: The Muzzling of Free Speech in America

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message John Whitehead     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 5 pages)
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 9/2/15

Author 87833
Become a Fan
  (39 fans)
From flickr.com/photos/66971402@N04/8334724671/: Muzzling of free speech.
Muzzling of free speech.
(Image by Franck BLAIS)
  Permission   Details   DMCA
p class="">"If the freedom of speech be taken away, then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter."--George Washington

The architects of the American police state must think we're idiots.

With every passing day, we're being moved further down the road towards a totalitarian society characterized by government censorship, violence, corruption, hypocrisy and intolerance, all packaged for our supposed benefit in the Orwellian doublespeak of national security, tolerance and so-called "government speech."

Long gone are the days when advocates of free speech could prevail in a case such as Tinker v. Des Moines. Indeed, it's been 50 years since 13-year-old Mary Beth Tinker was suspended for wearing a black armband to school in protest of the Vietnam War. In taking up her case, the U.S. Supreme Court declared that students do not "shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate."

Were Tinker to make its way through the courts today, it would have to overcome the many hurdles being placed in the path of those attempting to voice sentiments that may be construed as unpopular, offensive, conspiratorial, violent, threatening or anti-government.

Consider, if you will, that the U.S. Supreme Court, historically a champion of the First Amendment, has declared that citizens can exercise their right to free speech everywhere it's lawful--online, in social media, on a public sidewalk, etc.--as long as they don't do so in front of the Court itself.

What is the rationale for upholding this ban on expressive activity on the Supreme Court plaza?

"Allowing demonstrations directed at the Court, on the Court's own front terrace, would tend to yield the"impression"of a Court engaged with -- and potentially vulnerable to -- outside entreaties by the public."

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 1   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

John W. Whitehead is an attorney and author who has written, debated and practiced widely in the area of constitutional law and human rights. Whitehead's aggressive, pioneering approach to civil liberties has earned him numerous accolades and (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon



Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Operation Vigilant Eagle: Is This Really How We Honor Our Nation's Veterans?

The Path to Total Dictatorship: America's Shadow Government and Its Silent Coup

Licensed to Kill: The Growing Phenomenon of Police Shooting Unarmed Citizens

Miley Cyrus and the Pornification of America

Common Core: A Lesson Plan for Raising Up Compliant, Non-Thinking Citizens

The Land of the Blind: The Illusion of Freedom in America