Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 21 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

"Seek Peace While Preparing for War": Going to/after Trump about Climate Change

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   6 comments
Become a Premium Member Would you like to know how many people have read this article? Or how reputable the author is? Simply sign up for a Advocate premium membership and you'll automatically see this data on every article. Plus a lot more, too.
Author 53
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Andrew Schmookler
Become a Fan
  (31 fans)

Earth - Following a Polar Ice Melt
Earth - Following a Polar Ice Melt
(Image by Kevin M. Gill)
  Details   DMCA
This is the first sequel to the opening statement of this series, which laid out this basic idea:

In this extremely dangerous moment in our nation's history, we owe it to ourselves and our posterity to seek best-case scenarios with the new president, rather than merely assuming that all that we fear will come to pass. Because we have good reason to fear the worst, we also need to prepare to fight this dreadful new president to protect all those things that are vital to our values and our interests.What this calls for is moves that simultaneously test for the possibility of peace, and that also -- failing that -- position us advantageously for political war.

That strategy is applied, below, to the issue of climate change. For surely, with science telling us that climate change may be the biggest threat to our species in our history, and with Trump already moving in an absolutely calamitous direction on the issue, this is a matter on which we should strive for the best while being committed never to surrender to the worst.


Climate change deniers come in two main varieties: the corrupt and the ignorant.

The corrupt are people who know the truth of what the scientists are saying, but choose out of greed and/or ambition to sacrifice the future of our planet to serve the interests of the fossil fuel industries.

If Donald Trump is one of these corrupt deniers, then there is no chance for peace, and we will be compelled to fight him, to use Elizabeth Warren's recent mantra, "every step of the way."

But if Donald Trump is ignorant, then it is at least possible that if his ignorance were to be replaced by greater understanding, he might be induced to take a different path. And with Trump, who has displayed stunning ignorance on a great many issues, it seems to be a real possibility that he really doesn't know what science has so clearly established. Although he may be not only ignorant but ineducable, the possibility of education should at least be tested.

So the "seek peace" part of the strategy raises the question: is there a way that Trump's (presumed) ignorance on climate change might be dispelled?

Here's what I propose as a possible way:

Assemble a delegation consisting of some of the world's most outstanding and prestigious scientists -- presumably Nobel Prize winners, perhaps a half dozen in number -- accompanied by, say, three of the world's greatest climate scientists. In other words, a delegation that could present itself, and be seen by the public, as "the Voice of Science," and "the Voice of Science on Climate Change."

(I would hope that any scientist worth his or her salt would be willing to participate, the stakes are that huge, the urgency that pressing.)

Have this group begin with a public request for an audience with the President-Elect.

Their statement in which this request is made would, of course, call attention to the vital importance of this issue, and how crucial it is that a person shouldering the responsibilities of the American presidency understands fully the nature of the crisis we face. And so they request a chance to discuss with the President-Elect what science can tell us about what is happening on our planet, and what is at stake in the policy course the nation takes.

Either these eminent people -- representing the Voice of Science -- will be granted such a meeting with Trump or they will not. (Given the people around Trump, one must guess it's more likely that they will not.)

If Trump refuses to meet with this delegation, then the war begins.

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).


Must Read 2   Well Said 2   Valuable 2  
Rate It | View Ratings

Andrew Schmookler Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Andy Schmookler, an award-winning author, political commentator, radio talk-show host, and teacher, was the Democratic nominee for Congress from Virginia's 6th District. His new book -- written to have an impact on the central political battle of our time -- is (more...)
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Why Do Conservatives Like Colbert? Article Plus Critique

Mel Gibson's Rant as Profound Clue

To Anti-Obamite Lefties: It Doesn't Matter If You're Right

How Important is the Loss of Friendship?

# 8 Beliefs that Make Liberal America Weak: Barriers to the Source of Moral and Spiritual Passions

Power and Corruption: Just What Is Their Relationship?

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: