Power of Story Send a Tweet        
- Advertisement -

Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 3 (3 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   3 comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

Science Suggests Torture Probably Didn't Prevent Any Attacks

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Kevin Gosztola       (Page 1 of 3 pages)     Permalink

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)  Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H4 9/22/09

Author 7416
Become a Fan
  (66 fans)
- Advertisement -

A recently published scientific paper suggests that "harsh interrogations" (torture) most likely "impaired the memories of suspects, diminishing their ability to recall and provide the detailed information" the CIA wanted.

- Advertisement -

According to the AP, the scientific paper claims torture could have even caused "suspects to create --and believe--false memories."

Professor Shane O'Mara at Ireland's Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience, argues that:

- Advertisement -

"Solid scientific evidence on how repeated and extreme stress and pain affect memory and executive functions (such as planning or forming intentions) suggests these techniques are unlikely to do anything other than the opposite of that intended by coercive or enhanced interrogation."

O'Mara also writes "the assumption is that the (methods) are without effect on memory, or indeed facilitate the retrieval of information from memory." But, he goes on to say science suggests the opposite because "chronic stress and trauma" damages the hippocampus and, especially for long-term prisoners, the CIA's methods would have produced this result.

O'Mara suggests, "prolonged sleep deprivation, being chained in one position, exploitation of prisoners' phobias, and waterboarding" would "release stress hormones." If this happened repeatedly and for a prolonged period of time, brain function would be "compromised" and tissue loss would occur.

- Advertisement -

O'Mara adds:

""this could lead to brain lobe disorders, making the prisoners vulnerable to confabulation -- in this case, the pathological production of false memories based on suggestions from an interrogator. Those false memories mix with true information in the interrogation, making it difficult to distinguish between what is real and what is fabricated."

O'Mara suggests these techniques are flawed because they are based on "folk psychology."

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It


Kevin Gosztola is managing editor of Shadowproof Press. He also produces and co-hosts the weekly podcast, "Unauthorized Disclosure." He was an editor for OpEdNews.com

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

We Do Not Consent to Warrantless "Porno-Scanning" in Airports

Do They Put Lipstick on Pigs at the Funny Farm?

How Private Prison Corporations Hope Arizona's SB1070 Will Lead to Internment Camps for Illegals

Why the Battle Against TSA Groping and Body Scanners is Justified

Give Obama a Chance to Do What?