Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 30 Share on Twitter 3 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H1'ed 9/23/19

Saving the Planet Means Overthrowing the Ruling Elites

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     (# of views)   13 comments
Author 28678
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Chris Hedges
Become a Fan
  (453 fans)

From Truthdig


(Image by Mr. Fish/Truthdig)   Details   DMCA

Friday's climate strike by students across the globe will have no more impact than the mass mobilizations by women following the election of Donald Trump or the hundreds of thousands of protesters who took to the streets to denounce the Iraq War. This does not mean these protests should not have taken place. They should have. But such demonstrations need to be grounded in the bitter reality that in the corridors of power we do not count. If we lived in a democracy, which we do not, our aspirations, rights and demands, especially the demand that we confront the climate emergency, would have an impact. We would be able to vote representatives into power in government to carry out change. We would be able to demand environmental justice from the courts. We would be able to divert resources to the elimination of carbon emissions.

Voting, lobbying, petitioning and protesting to induce the ruling elites to respond rationally to the climate catastrophe have proved no more effective than scrofula victims' appeals to Henry VIII to cure them with a royal touch. The familiar tactics employed over the past few decades by environmentalists have been spectacular failures. In 1900 the burning of fossil fuel -- mostly coal -- produced about 2 billion tons of carbon dioxide a year. That number had risen threefold by 1950. Today the level is 20 times higher than the 1900 figure. During the last decade the increase in CO2 was 100 to 200 times faster than what the earth experienced during the transition from the last ice age. On May 11 the Mauna Loa Observatory in Hawaii recorded 415.26 parts per million of CO2 in the air. It's believed to be the highest concentration since humans evolved. We will embrace a new paradigm for resistance or die.

The ruling elites and the corporations they serve are the principal obstacles to change. They cannot be reformed. And this means revolution, which is what Extinction Rebellion seeks in calling for an "international rebellion" on Oct. 7, when it will attempt to shut down city centers around the globe in acts of sustained, mass civil disobedience. Power has to be transferred into our hands. And since the elites won't give up power willingly, we will have to take it through nonviolent action.

Protests can be the beginning of political consciousness. But they can also be empty political theater. They can be used to celebrate our moral probity -- advertisements, especially in the age of social media, for ourselves. They can be a boutique activism in which protesters allow themselves to be funneled through police barricades and arrests are politely choreographed, resulting in a few hours in jail and the credentialing of the demonstrators as radicals. They can be used to distance ourselves from a repugnant political figure such as Donald Trump, while leaving us silent and complicit when the same policies are carried out by a supposed progressive such as Barack Obama. This is a game the state has learned to play to its advantage. As long as we do not disrupt the machine, as long as we protest according to their rules, the elites will let us march through the streets of Washington in pussy hats or walk out of school for a day.

When power is threatened, as it was in the sustained protests during the Occupy encampments and at Standing Rock, the ruling elites react very differently. They employ the full weight of the surveillance state to demonize the protesters, arrest and detain the leadership and infiltrate agents provocateurs to carry out violent assaults to justify the use of the police and security forces to shut the protests down.

Preemptive efforts by the security forces to harass and thwart Extinction Rebellion's planned October occupation of city centers, an action designed to negatively affect commerce and bring parts of major cities to a standstill, have already begun. Roger Hallam, the co-founder of Extinction Rebellion, was arrested Sept. 14 and charged with attempting to cause a disruption at Heathrow Airport by using a drone. Hallam has called Heathrow -- which climate activists say emits 18 million tons of carbon dioxide a year, more than the total emissions of 118 countries -- a "crime against humanity." He and other activists have vowed to halt the airport's plans to build a third runway. Hallam's case will be heard at the Isleworth Crown Court on Oct. 14, meaning he will not be released until after the Oct. 7 protests. In addition, other Extinction Rebellion organizers, including Andrew Medhurst, have been arrested in England, and police have seized their phones and computers.

It does not matter who is the public face of the corporate state. This is not about political personalities. It was Obama, after all, who oversaw a coordinated national effort to eradicate the Occupy encampments and place the water protectors at Standing Rock under siege. Obama's environmental policies, despite his lip service to curbing global warming and his support of the nonbinding Paris climate accord -- which the climate scientist James Hansen called a fraud -- were appalling. U.S. oil production rose every year he was in office, an increase of 88%. It was the largest domestic increase in oil production in American history. Obama opened offshore drilling to American oil companies as if he were Sarah Palin. "American energy production, you wouldn't always know it, but it went up every year I was president," Obama told an audience at Rice University last year. "And you know that ... suddenly America's like the biggest oil producer ... that was me, people."

Democrats, like Republicans, serve corporate power. They will not end government subsidies for the fossil fuel industry and the extraction industries. They will not impose carbon taxes to keep fossil fuels in the ground. They will not limit overconsumption. The technologies they invest in -- fracking, hybrid cars, genetically modified food -- are designed to maintain or expand consumption levels, not reduce them. They will not redirect the trillions of dollars and scientific and technical expertise from the military and corporations toward saving us from environmental catastrophe. The rhetoric and gimmicks they use to placate the public, from carbon credits to wind turbines and solar panels, are, as the scientist James Lovelock says, the equivalent of 18th-century doctors attempting to cure serious diseases with leeches and mercury.

The creation of ever more complex bureaucratic and technocratic systems in an age of diminishing resources is a characteristic of dying civilizations. Civilizations in their final phase frantically search for new methods of exploitation rather than adapt to a changing environment. They repress and exploit the lower classes with greater and greater ruthlessness to maintain the insatiable appetites among the elites for power, luxury and hedonism. The worse things get, the more the elites retreat into their private enclaves. The more out of touch the elites become, the more catastrophe is assured. This self-defeating process degrades the ecosystem until catastrophic systems collapse.

The ruling elites, trained in business schools and managerial programs, are not equipped to confront the existential problems caused by climate catastrophe. They are trained to maintain, no matter the cost, the systems of global capitalism. They are systems managers. They lack the intellectual capacity and imagination to search for solutions outside the narrow parameters of global capitalism.

Those living in the global south are already suffering and dying from the effects of global warming, for which the wealthy industrialized nations of the global north bear most of the responsibility. The richest 0.54%, or 42 million people across the world, are responsible for more emissions than the poorest half of the global population, or 3.8 billion people. These elites are sacrificing the poorest on the planet first as they work up the social and economic hierarchy to extinguish us all.

We have to let go of our relentless positivism, our absurd mania for hope, our naive belief that with grit and determination we can solve all problems. We have to face the bleakness before us. We live in a world already heavily damaged by global warming, which will inevitably get worse. Refusal to participate in the further destruction of the planet means a rupture with traditional politics. It means noncooperation with authority. It means defying in every nonviolent way possible consumer capitalism, militarism and imperialism. It means adjusting our lifestyle, including becoming vegans, to thwart the forces bent upon our annihilation. And it means waves of sustained civil disobedience until the machine is broken.

The biosphere, including the Amazon rainforest, the oceans and the polar ice caps, is visibly deteriorating. Heat waves are crippling Europe, Australia and the American Southwest. Floods devastate the Midwest. Last week, southeast Texas suffered heavy flooding and deaths when it was hit by the seventh-wettest tropical cyclone in U.S. history, with some areas receiving more than 40 inches of rainfall within three days. Monster hurricanes ravage the Caribbean and the shores of the United States. Wildfires consume the forests of the West Coast. But despite the tangible signs of a climate emergency, the elites continue to assure us we can live as we have always lived.

The mathematical models for the future of the planet have three devastating trajectories: a massive die-off of perhaps 70 percent of the human population and then an uneasy stabilization; extinction of humans and most other species; an immediate and radical reconfiguration of human society to protect the biosphere and make it more diverse and productive. This third scenario, which most scientists admit is unlikely, is dependent on a halt to the production and consumption of fossil fuels, converting to a plant-based diet to destroy the animal agriculture industry -- almost as large a contributor to greenhouse gases as the fossil fuel industry -- and greening the deserts and restoring rainforests. We know what we have to do if our children are to have a future. The only question left is how do we empower leaders who will save us.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Must Read 2   Supported 2   Well Said 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Chris Hedges Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Chris Hedges spent nearly two decades as a foreign correspondent in Central America, the Middle East, Africa and the Balkans. He has reported from more than 50 countries and has worked for The Christian Science Monitor, National Public Radio, The Dallas Morning News and The New York Times, for which he was a foreign correspondent for 15 years.

Hedges was part of the team of (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Coming Collapse

The Radical Christian Right and the War on Government

Why the United States Is Destroying Its Education System

Rise Up or Die

This Is What Resistance Looks Like

The Most Brazen Corporate Power Grab in American History

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

9 people are discussing this page, with 13 comments


Charles Homer

Become a Fan
Author 511996
(Member since Aug 27, 2018), 1 fan, 145 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

As shown in this article, in the future, governments around the world may be willing to go to extreme lengths to punish nations that breach climate protocols:

click here

So much for the concept of national sovereignty.

Submitted on Monday, Sep 23, 2019 at 2:15:13 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (2+)
Help

911TRUTH

Become a Fan
Author 15356
(Member since Apr 29, 2008), 28 fans, 2720 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content
Saving the Planet Means Overthrowing the Ruling Elites

Yeah, good luck with that.

Submitted on Monday, Sep 23, 2019 at 4:42:15 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (4+)
Help

Chuck Nafziger

Become a Fan
Author 24101
(Member since Oct 12, 2008), 15 fans, 6 articles, 14 quicklinks, 2062 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

Make the rest of your life better. Decide to be happy on this first day of Autumn, 2019, and keep it up til you die. This ain't rocket science.

Submitted on Monday, Sep 23, 2019 at 5:08:23 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (5+)
Help
Indent

Derryl Hermanutz

Become a Fan
Author 64335
(Member since Apr 27, 2011), 50 fans, 24 articles, 1 quicklinks, 1508 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to Chuck Nafziger:   New Content

Right on Chuck. It's, "Be the change you want to see." It's not, What can "we" do? I don't need anybody's permission to stop eating meat, to stop driving everywhere and walk instead, to stop buying junk I don't need, to stop using plastic bags. I can simply choose to be part of the solution. If enough other people choose to become part of the solution, then together "we" will have solved some of the problems. Also, I feel healthier (and lighter and thinner) with our near-vegan diet, and long daily walks, and other lifestyle improvements that are both personally and environmentally beneficial.

Submitted on Monday, Sep 23, 2019 at 5:53:03 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (7+)
Help
IndentIndent

David Wieland

Become a Fan
Author 512811
(Member since Jan 1, 2019), 113 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to Derryl Hermanutz:   New Content

If a vegan diet works for you, that's a reasonable choice (although I hope you're aware of the deficiencies you need to compensate to stay healthy). For myself, my naturally thin body type needs more nutritionally dense food to maintain health and build strength, which means a high proportion of animal fat and protein. Lots of walking is good with any diet though (as long as the knees aren't acting up ­čśÉ). And always looking for ways to minimize waste is certainly a worthy outlook.

Submitted on Tuesday, Sep 24, 2019 at 3:41:55 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (2+)
Help
IndentIndentIndent

nelswight

Become a Fan
Author 2581
(Member since Sep 3, 2006), 558 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to David Wieland:   New Content

Quite well posited, David.

Submitted on Tuesday, Sep 24, 2019 at 4:02:57 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help

Rich Buckley

Become a Fan
Author 73630
(Member since Nov 14, 2011), 2 fans, 40 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

Hi Mr. Hedges. I love your articles and support your work. Why do you never discuss geoengineering (chemtrails) in all its obvious deceptions? We must start the conversation.

Submitted on Monday, Sep 23, 2019 at 8:15:39 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (4+)
Help

Robert Gormley

Become a Fan
Author 42289
(Member since Dec 12, 2009), 360 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

Hedges could make a big difference if he supported the

9/11 truth movement. I wonder what's stopping him.

Submitted on Monday, Sep 23, 2019 at 10:06:57 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (4+)
Help

Peter Duveen

Become a Fan
Author 20762
(Member since Aug 30, 2008), 28 fans, 38 articles, 2 quicklinks, 2524 comments, 73 diaries
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

There is an assumption that the masses would like to relegate their authority to the likes of "Extinction Rebellion." What about those who do not sign onto the "climate change" meme? As an aside, there are many reasons for cutting down on pollution of all sorts. One does not need the "climate change" narrative for this. One can't help but imagine that the "climate change" narrative is just another agenda-laden manipulative device. The point being that people do not want to fall into the hands of the unscrupulous, so they may be reluctant to back "Extinction Rebellion"'s efforts. In other words, if they want to press the powers that be to surrender, and that seems to be their rather unrealistic goal, that is, if they are for real and not just another establishment prop, one asks, surrender to what or who? Now if I were doing this mess, I would go after particular companies, bringing them to their knees one after another through a boycott. But one must applaud almost any action that tries to check the unbridled power of the establishment.

Submitted on Monday, Sep 23, 2019 at 11:45:04 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (4+)
Help
Indent

David Wieland

Become a Fan
Author 512811
(Member since Jan 1, 2019), 113 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to Peter Duveen:   New Content

I'm not sure that boycotts are appropriate or effective, but I certainly agree that we should be wary of climbing onto any bandwagon. As Charlie Munger has wisely observed, "heavy ideology is one of the most extreme distorters of human cognition". Surrendering freedom is a very heavy price to pay for some imagined, hoped-for improvement.

Submitted on Tuesday, Sep 24, 2019 at 3:26:46 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)
Help
Indent

nelswight

Become a Fan
Author 2581
(Member since Sep 3, 2006), 558 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to Peter Duveen:   New Content

and check the unbridled capitalist system, Peter.

Submitted on Tuesday, Sep 24, 2019 at 3:57:47 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help

David Wieland

Become a Fan
Author 512811
(Member since Jan 1, 2019), 113 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

Regarding the article:

Really? More catastrophe talk? How can intelligent people blindly accept such guff? Data (that is, measurements) don't support such a concept. It's high time to recognize that we're being misled by activists who care not a fig for science but are determined to push dogmatic views.

The ones who understand what they're doing may be in line to profit personally (e.g., the renewables industry, climate scientists and other academics, some politicians) or to see their favoured economic/governance system replace what are generally called democracies, which allow voting and individual action. Those who follow along, providing support, think they're just doing the right thing by offering blind trust. The damage to critical thinking and our children's education is severe. This is where we have a real crisis, seemingly unaware of how this is crippling our ability to address true problems in the developed and under-developed parts of the world.

Submitted on Tuesday, Sep 24, 2019 at 6:33:40 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (2+)
Help
Indent

Peter Duveen

Become a Fan
Author 20762
(Member since Aug 30, 2008), 28 fans, 38 articles, 2 quicklinks, 2524 comments, 73 diaries
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to David Wieland:   New Content

"The damage to critical thinking and our children's education is severe." Absolutely, and true in a number of other alleged "scientific" presentations to our school kids, who come out being dumber than a door-nail regarding critical thinking and analysis.

I want to add that this protest completely co-opts the anti war movement, which should play "the" prominent role in any protest against the establishment. By making it about climate change, it turns the whole deal into a red herring, so it looks like this is designed to distract from real reasons to dump the establishment.

Submitted on Tuesday, Sep 24, 2019 at 2:03:45 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (2+)
Help

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment