120 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 102 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
General News    H3'ed 3/20/23

Ross Douthat on "What It Means to Be Woke" (REVIEW ESSAY)

By       (Page 1 of 3 pages)   No comments

Thomas Farrell
Message Thomas Farrell
Become a Fan
  (22 fans)

Walter Ong
Walter Ong
(Image by josemota from flickr)
  Details   DMCA

Duluth, Minnesota (OpEdNews) March 20, 2023: The self-styled conservative columnist Ross Douthat recently published "What It Means to Be Woke" (dated March 18, 2023) in the New York Times:

Click Here

In it, Douthat says that the hard-to-define term "woke" is used by conservative commentators today to refer to "[t]he revolution inside American liberalism [that] is a crucial ideological transformation of our time." Evidently, conservatives today prefer to use "woke" as their favored pejorative term - evidently replacing their use of "political correctness" as their favored pejorative term. I should mention here that Wikipedia has entries on each of these two terms.

Even though the term "woke" is admittedly hard to define, Douthat undertakes the task of operationally defining and explaining the pejorative term as used in conservativism today to critique progressivism today. So conservatism vs. progressivism = conservatives vs. progressives.

I assume here that OEN readers identify themselves as progressives, not as conservatives.

Now, Douthat says that he will proceed to operationally define and explain "the 'woke' worldview" "as if I myself believed in it" - which, of course, he does not.

Douthat begins his analysis by asking, "What is America all about, at its best?" At its best, America is about "[e]quality and liberty."

But we should note that conservative American libertarians emphasize liberty.

In any event, Douthat claims that "the left [is] all about" "[t]ransforming those ideals [of equality and liberty] into lived realities."

But this claim seems to suggest that the right is not about transforming the ideals of equality and liberty into lived realities - conservative American libertarians to the contrary notwithstanding.

Which raises the question: What is the right about?

Which also raises the question: Can Douthat, or anyone else, operationally define and explain what the American left today is about without also operationally defining and explaining what the American right today is about?

But why? Because the American left today and the American right today tend to gravitate toward polar opposition to one another. Their polar opposition to one another tend to be manifested today in the tendency of the two major political parties in the United States today, the Democratic Party and the Republican Party to advocate opposing positions on key political and cultural issues.

Next, Douthat explicitly states that he is referring to "the cultural and psychological structures that perpetuate oppression before law and policy begins to play a part" in "attempts to win legal rights or redistribute wealth." He says, "This [attempt to look deeper] is what the terminology of the academy has long been trying to describe - the way that generations of racist, homophobic, sexist, and heteronormative power have inscribed themselves not just in our laws but [in] our very psyches. And once you see these forces in operation, you can't unsee them - you are, well, 'awake' - and you cannot accept any analysis that doesn't acknowledge how they permeate our lives."

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Thomas Farrell Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Thomas James Farrell is professor emeritus of writing studies at the University of Minnesota Duluth (UMD). He started teaching at UMD in Fall 1987, and he retired from UMD at the end of May 2009. He was born in 1944. He holds three degrees from Saint Louis University (SLU): B.A. in English, 1966; M.A.(T) in English 1968; Ph.D.in higher education, 1974. On May 16, 1969, the editors of the SLU student newspaper named him Man of the Year, an honor customarily conferred on an administrator or a faculty member, not on a graduate student -- nor on a woman up to that time. He is the proud author of the book (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Was the Indian Jesuit Anthony de Mello Murdered in the U.S. 25 Years Ago? (BOOK REVIEW)

Who Was Walter Ong, and Why Is His Thought Important Today?

Celebrating Walter J. Ong's Thought (REVIEW ESSAY)

More Americans Should Live Heroic Lives of Virtue (Review Essay)

Hillary Clinton Urges Us to Stand Up to Extremists in the U.S.

Martha Nussbaum on Why Democracy Needs the Humanities (Book Review)

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend