Power of Story Send a Tweet        

Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (1 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   35 comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

Repeal the Second Amendment.

By       Message Allan Goldstein       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     Permalink

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  Add to My Group(s)

Funny 5   Well Said 2   Valuable 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 7/1/14

Author 29544
Become a Fan
  (22 fans)
- Advertisement -

Ban Guns
(Image by Constant Contact)
  Permission   Details   DMCA
Deadlines being what they are, I'm not sure which gun tragedy will be foremost on your mind when you read this column. I am confident, however, that there will be one. Somebody shot up a campus, a mall, a workplace, today, yesterday or tomorrow. In America, gun massacres are always in the news.

Is there anything we can do to stop the cascade of corpses appearing nightly on our screens, large and small? Other than buy a smartphone case covered in black crepe?

Yes, there is. We can repeal the Second Amendment. That's a good place to start. That's the only place to start, because every effort we make at sensible gun regulation runs up against that brick wall and falls down as dead as the latest victims of random, massively predictable gun violence.

- Advertisement -

The Second Amendment assures we can do nothing to reduce the gun carnage that kills about 30,000 Americans per year. True, 20,000 of them are suicides, but the Second Amendment makes suicide far too easy. Over half of all successful suicides are by self-inflicted gunshot and at that range you rarely miss.

I wonder how many of those gunshot suicides would change their minds if they had a second chance? The Second Amendment could be called the "No Second Chance" Amendment, for suicides and rash, un-premeditated murders alike. A gun just makes killing too easy.

Every time a kindergarten full of kids is shot up and an outraged nation mourns, somebody will call for a new law, something simple and obvious, like limiting a magazine to say, a hundred rounds, and for a day or two it seems like a good idea. Then comes the "You can't do that, it's against the Second Amendment!" and the NRA cackles into its Dracula cloak.

- Advertisement -

The NRA is entirely correct. We can't do squat about the epidemic of gun violence plaguing the nation because the Second Amendment won't let us.

The Second Amendment is the only thing that is immune to gunshots in America. The Second Amendment is lead-proof.

But it's not vote-proof. We can repeal it and we should. I'm not saying it will be easy, many people are fanatic about their guns. They say having weaponry is a right worth dying for. They've got that right.

The original justification for the Second Amendment was, as far as anyone can tell, to protect the people from tyranny. Well, actually they said something about a well-regulated militia but I don't think even they knew what that meant.

But whatever it meant, it is clearly obsolete now. How is a handheld weapon supposed to protect one from a government that can shoot a predator drone through your bedroom window before you can take the safety off your AK?

So it's not about defending yourself against tyranny. But what about sportsmen? Some people cherish the Second Amendment because they want to go into the woods and kill Bambi. We have a long and hallowed tradition of going into the woods and killing Bambi in America. It stems from the days when Bambi was food.

- Advertisement -

Personally, I prefer Bambi packaged, butchered and stacked on the supermarket shelf, but I admit to some hypocrisy there. If I really loved Bambi that much I'd be a vegetarian and I'm no such thing.

I'm not saying it should be automatically illegal to hunt the poor defenseless critters of forest and stream. If a state wants to allow that activity they should have that right. But if a state wants, by popular vote of its citizens, to ban rifles, handguns, and/or automatic weaponry it should have that right as well.

But it can't, because of the anachronistic, tyrannical Second Amendment. For freedom's sake, it has to go.

Once upon a time the nation began to wise up about the epidemic of gun violence. Sensible gun regulations were passed in many places and sensible people were pleased.

Next Page  1  |  2


- Advertisement -

Funny 5   Well Said 2   Valuable 2  
View Ratings | Rate It


San Francisco based columnist, author, gym rat and novelist. My book, "The Confessions of a Catnip Junkie" is the best memoir ever written by a cat. Available on Amazon.com, or wherever fine literature is sold with no sales tax collected. For (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Broken Unions, Broken Nation, and the Lie that Keeps us Broke

Republican Autoerotic Asphyxiation

The Short, Sad Life of Greedaholics Anonymous

How do you know if you're an artist?

"The Memoirs of the White House Janitor." By Cosmo "Ace" Willingham.

What do we lose if we "lose" in Afghanistan?