516 online
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 42 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H4'ed 8/5/17

Remembering the Gulf of Tonkin, and the Consequences of Wanting to Believe

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   No comments

Fair org

See original here

By Janine Jackson

The USS Maddox in the Gulf of Tonkin.
The USS Maddox in the Gulf of Tonkin.
(Image by (photo: US Navy))
  Details   DMCA

"American Planes Hit North Vietnam After Second Attack on Our Destroyers; Move Taken to Halt New Aggression," was the Washington Post headline some 53 years ago, on August 5, 1964.

The front page of that day's New York Times reported: "President Johnson has ordered retaliatory action against gunboats and 'certain supporting facilities in North Vietnam' after renewed attacks against American destroyers in the Gulf of Tonkin."

Of course, as historians now acknowledge, there was no "second attack" by North Vietnam -- no "renewed attacks against American destroyers."

But as activist, author and FAIR associate Norman Solomon has described, including in the film War Made Easy, US journalists reported those official claims as absolute truths, ignoring countervailing evidence and opening the floodgates for the bloody Vietnam War and the deaths of over 50,000 Americans and millions of Southeast Asians.

The official story was that North Vietnamese torpedo boats launched an "unprovoked attack" against the US destroyer Maddox, which was on "routine patrol" in the Tonkin Gulf on August 2 -- and that North Vietnamese PT boats followed up with a "deliberate attack" two days later, firing 22 torpedoes on the Maddox and another destroyer, Turner Joy.

President Johnson was on television that night, telling Americans that "aggression by terror against the peaceful villagers of South Vietnam has now been joined by open aggression on the high seas against the United States of America," ordering retaliatory airstrikes representing a momentous escalation of the war, and calling for immediate passage of the Gulf of Tonkin resolution, which stated, "Congress approves and supports the determination of the president, as commander in chief, to take all necessary measures to repel any armed attack against the forces of the United States and to prevent further aggression."

"It's like grandmother's nightshirt. It covers everything," Johnson quipped.

The House dispensed with hearings and approved in 40 minutes; the Senate took two days, finally voting 88 to 2 to adopt.

But reality was very different from the tale that Johnson and the press told the public.

The Maddox, which fired first in the earlier skirmish, was not on routine patrol; it was engaged in aggressive intelligence-gathering maneuvers -- in sync with coordinated attacks on North Vietnam by the South Vietnamese navy and the Laotian air force.

And as for the second reported attack, the spark for the "retaliatory" airstrikes, it simply never happened. Many historians think the Maddox crew mistook their sonar's pings off their own rudder for North Vietnamese torpedoes; Johnson later "joked" they might've been shooting at whales.

But it shouldn't surprise you to know that there was plenty of intelligence at the time suggesting that no attack had occurred; it was just overlooked and obscured -- intentionally by warmongers in the government, but also by a credulous press. Sound familiar?

Johnson's late-night speech won editorial praise. The president, said the New York Times, "went to the American people last night with the somber facts." The LA Times urged Americans to "face the fact that the Communists, by their attack on American vessels in international waters, have themselves escalated the hostilities."

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Must Read 1   Supported 1   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Fair Org Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

FAIR, the national media watch group, has been offering well-documented criticism of media bias and censorship since 1986. We work to invigorate the First Amendment by advocating for greater diversity in the press and by scrutinizing media (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

NYT Declares Snowden a Thief -- and Journalism a Crime

Remembering the Gulf of Tonkin, and the Consequences of Wanting to Believe

Do Racists Like Fox News, or Does Fox Make People Racist?

Facebook's New Propaganda Partners

Centrist Pundits Paved Way for Trump's 'Alt-Left' False Equivalence

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend