54 online
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 63 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Reforms Against Partisan Gridlock Would Protect Incumbents Too

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   No comments
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Robert Weiner
Become a Fan
  (5 fans)

Capitol Building
Capitol Building
(Image by Rob Kall)
  Details   DMCA

By Robert Weiner and Jared Schwartz

Polling by CBS and Gallup shows that 73 percent of Americans disapprove of Congress, which is higher than the 70 percent who disapproved of BP's handling of the New Horizon oil spill, and BP turned the entire Gulf of Mexico into an oil slick.

Right now, there's a criminal justice bill finally passing. The bill has the support of President Trump, Rep. Paul Ryan, Sen. Chuck Grassley, Sen. Dick Durbin, Corey Booker, the Fraternal Order of Police, and the ACLU. Nevertheless, Sen. McConnell had to be dragged kicking and screaming to bring it to the floor for a vote. Mechanisms that would empower individuals and minority members to bypass the leadership would help end this sort of situation.

Even though this sort of rules reform would take away some power for leadership, it would give them great longevity. A more efficient, bipartisan Congress would help the majority prevent itself from being swept out of power in another wave of electoral rage. The rules that Pelosi and the Problem Solvers Caucus have agreed to are a start, but they don't go far enough, and they don't include the Senate. Congress -- on both sides of the Hill, House and Senate-- need a more robust rules reform package and should try to pass it on January 3rd when the House votes on rules. Maybe call it the Congress Protection Act.

Reforming the legislative process alone, though, is not enough. The most high-profile example of Congressional dysfunction, the circus-like Kavanaugh hearings just six weeks ago, was exacerbated by the current rules structure. After Dr. Christine Blasey Ford's accusation, the Republican majority and the White House-directed FBI investigators refused to call corroborating witnesses, including other women with claims or Kavanaugh's college roommates. or even verify locations by driving Ford to them. In the absence of any fuller investigation, the Republicans claimed nothing was found, Democrats used their time to hyperbolize, Ford looked unsupported, and Kavanaugh claimed he was victimized by political enemies. The public, horrified by the hearing, suffered from all sides. The Kavanaugh hearing was a terrible but true example proving the need for reform.

Congressional investigations and passing legislation are too critical to allow any party to have a monopoly over them. Empowering the minority and individual members in Congress, regardless of who is in power in the White House or "under the Dome," to quote Roll Call Editor Jason Dick's book title, would push Congress towards a fairer and more efficient system. The suggestions below would help address the two primary sources of Congressional dysfunction: partisan investigations and total agenda control by the leadership by spreading Congressional authority around.

***Hire more expert, bipartisan staff for committees. Use the staff to bridge the gap between the minority and majority, enabling informed input on bills.

***Give committee chairs the power to report some limited legislation directly to the floor. This would allow the committees with the expertise to place important items on the agenda.

***Empower the minority to require testimony from one witness for every witness the majority calls -- not just one altogether-- and alternate between majority and minority witnesses. This would help committees get the whole story and lessen the public perception that investigations are biased and pre-determined.

***Stop Congress' ability to block nonpartisan CBO and CRS reports. Any report Congress tries to hide is probably a report the American people deserve to see, such as the 2012 CRS report that Senator McConnell blocked showing that wealthy tax cuts weren't effective job creators, and government jobs were the best catalyst. Luckily, the CRS Division released the report regardless, but that should not have to happen to achieve the truth on any issue.

***Set a quantitative procedure for bills arriving on the floor with an open amendment process, with floor time restrictions allowed.

***Enact the joint committee to reform Congress proposed by Reps. Lipinski and LaHood. Give the committee teeth by promising to bring its suggestions to a vote. This could happen after any first Rules reform package is approved January 3.

Power sharing mechanisms and procedures that allow moderate, well thought out legislation to come to the floor, irrespective of what kind, will lead to a Congress that serves the American people more than it serves the majority party. Before the new House and Senate rules are voted on in January, patriots on both sides of the political spectrum and moderates in the middle should keep pushing for institutional change. A reformed House and Senate, not merely a House under a different party's leadership, would protect future reelections of members of both bodies. More importantly, it would fulfill the calling to govern wisely that so many lawmakers pursue.

Robert Weiner is former spokesman, Clinton and Bush White Houses ONDCP, House Government Operations Committee, House Narcotics Committee, House Aging Committee, and Congressmen Pepper, Koch, Rangel, and Conyers. Jared Schwartz is policy analyst, Robert Weiner Associates and Solutions for Change

Rate It | View Ratings

Robert Weiner Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Robert Weiner, NATIONAL PUBLIC AFFAIRS AND ISSUES STRATEGIST Bob Weiner, a national issues and public affairs strategist, has been spokesman for and directed the public affairs offices of White House Drug Czar and Four Star General Barry (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Why Do Conservatives Vote Against Their Own Interest?

Jeb Bush's Elephant in the Room: Role in Bush v. Gore Recount

Mueller's End Game: Maybe As Soon As Trump Wants, But Not How He'd Like

Food Stamp Myth Busting

Iran: Nuclear Weapons or Peaceful Energy?

Bad money vs. bad money -- how Denver ballot measure could be blueprint for getting money out of politics

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend