47 online
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 11 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Prop 34: Truth, Indeed, But Not The Whole Truth

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   3 comments
Message Kenneth E. Hartman
Become a Fan
  (3 fans)



In response to Ana Zamora's short rebuttal to my piece "Why I'd Vote for the S.A.F.E. California Act," I offer the following:

     Proposition 34 will condemn thousands of prisoners to life in prison without the possibility of parole.   Because the initiative hardens and deepens the legal supports for the other death penalty, because it norms a sentence that should be unheard of, and because it sinks the thousands already serving the sentence into a pool of quicksand even deeper than before, the whole truth is thousands of prisoners will be dying in prison.

     Proposition 34 elevates the status of second degree murder sentences of life without the possibility of parole from a statutory to a constitutional level because of the use of the initiative process.   Therefore, these crimes will be irreversible in practice.   The whole truth is neither the 1977 statutes that created life without the possibility of parole, nor the Briggs Initiative of 1978 included any second degree murder level crimes as eligible for the other death penalty.  

     Proposition 34 uses the same kind of math that politicians employ when trying to justify spending huge amounts of money some time in the future.   By weighing only the front-loaded costs, and ignoring the long-term costs of thousands of old, sick, and dying prisoners, the math adds up in their favor.   The whole truth is a more honest and all encompassing assessment would yield a different result.  

     Proposition 34 does, indeed, create a law enforcement slush fund that claims to be time limited to three years.   Assuming that the vast criminal justice empire of California is going to simply concede to the termination of this funding is naà ve, at best.   The whole truth is the first job of every bureaucracy is to grow, and nobody grows better than our law enforcement agencies.  

     Finally, while I appreciate Ana Zamora's measured tone and civility, and while I'm sure we probably agree on about 99% of the issues as regards criminal justice, on this issue she's simply wrong.   This November, California voters will NOT have a chance to choose between the death penalty and an "alternate" sentence.   They will merely be choosing between methods of execution.   That is the whole truth.  

Well Said 1   Touching 1   Interesting 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Kenneth E. Hartman Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Kenneth E. Hartman has served 30 continuous years in the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation on a life without the possibility of parole (LWOP) sentence. He is the author of "Mother California: A Story of Redemption Behind (more...)
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Prisons: Past, Present, Future

It's Time To Change The Prisons

Bad Things Happen in the Dark

Why I'd Vote for the SAFE California Act

Prop 34: Truth, Indeed, But Not The Whole Truth

Us Against The World

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend