Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   3 comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

Prop 34: Truth, Indeed, But Not The Whole Truth

By       Message Kenneth E. Hartman     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 1   Touching 1   Interesting 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Author 48557
Become a Fan
  (3 fans)
- Advertisement -

In response to Ana Zamora's short rebuttal to my piece "Why I'd Vote for the S.A.F.E. California Act," I offer the following:

     Proposition 34 will condemn thousands of prisoners to life in prison without the possibility of parole.   Because the initiative hardens and deepens the legal supports for the other death penalty, because it norms a sentence that should be unheard of, and because it sinks the thousands already serving the sentence into a pool of quicksand even deeper than before, the whole truth is thousands of prisoners will be dying in prison.

- Advertisement -

     Proposition 34 elevates the status of second degree murder sentences of life without the possibility of parole from a statutory to a constitutional level because of the use of the initiative process.   Therefore, these crimes will be irreversible in practice.   The whole truth is neither the 1977 statutes that created life without the possibility of parole, nor the Briggs Initiative of 1978 included any second degree murder level crimes as eligible for the other death penalty.  

     Proposition 34 uses the same kind of math that politicians employ when trying to justify spending huge amounts of money some time in the future.   By weighing only the front-loaded costs, and ignoring the long-term costs of thousands of old, sick, and dying prisoners, the math adds up in their favor.   The whole truth is a more honest and all encompassing assessment would yield a different result.  

     Proposition 34 does, indeed, create a law enforcement slush fund that claims to be time limited to three years.   Assuming that the vast criminal justice empire of California is going to simply concede to the termination of this funding is naïve, at best.   The whole truth is the first job of every bureaucracy is to grow, and nobody grows better than our law enforcement agencies.  

     Finally, while I appreciate Ana Zamora's measured tone and civility, and while I'm sure we probably agree on about 99% of the issues as regards criminal justice, on this issue she's simply wrong.   This November, California voters will NOT have a chance to choose between the death penalty and an "alternate" sentence.   They will merely be choosing between methods of execution.   That is the whole truth.  

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

 

- Advertisement -

Well Said 1   Touching 1   Interesting 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Kenneth E. Hartman has served 30 continuous years in the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation on a life without the possibility of parole (LWOP) sentence. He is the author of "Mother California: A Story of Redemption Behind (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon



Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Prisons: Past, Present, Future

It's Time To Change The Prisons

Bad Things Happen in the Dark

Why I'd Vote for the SAFE California Act

Prop 34: Truth, Indeed, But Not The Whole Truth

Us Against The World