Assistant Treasury Secretary Herbert M. Allison Jr. on home mortgage-loan modifications
Early in his term of office, President Obama set the standard by which voters should judge his administration, saying it would be tested by how successful it had been in ending the nation's economic downturn.
In his recent State of the Union Address, President Obama made clear how he intends to resolve the home mortgage foreclosure crisis namely, by ignoring it. He offered no options for distressed homeowners, aside from their securing conventional mortgage loan refinancing at lower interest rates. However, because of the depressed housing market, millions of homeowners hold mortgage debts greater than the value of their homes; they are, as industry analysts describe it, underwater. Deutsche Bank had projected that 25 million, or 48 percent, of all homeowners will be "underwater' in their mortgages next year. Furthermore, diminished home values make conventional bank refinancing impossible, because, sadly, the Federal government's TARP bank-rescue program was never intended to assist homeowners to modify their mortgage terms.
Otherwise, it is difficult to understand how the Obama administration expects the economy to recover, since high mortgage payments, when combined with declining home values, have further depressed the housing market that triggered the economic recession in the first place. Underwater homeowners are faced with a devil's dilemma, because they cannot afford their inflated mortgage payments, nor sell their homes at prices that will permit them to satisfy those homes' mortgage debts. This leaves homeowners with effectively two options: namely, resorting to so-called short-sales (i.e. convincing the lender to accept a loss when the home is sold for less than the mortgage owed), or, worse, foreclosure, which is a process that affects an owner's credit worthiness, similar to legal bankruptcy. The result of all this is that millions of homeowners will not only suffer eviction from their homes, but also ruin their credit, which curtails their consumer spending and further damages the prospect of general economic recovery. Moreover, the economic ripple effects of foreclosures cause neighborhood home values to plummet while at the same time diminishing municipal tax bases.
So far, President Obama's Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) has assisted only 31,000 homeowners to modify their mortgages, whilst millions more remain on the brink of foreclosure. The President's meager housing efforts are faulty in their conception, since homeowners living in high-priced housing markets in states like California, Massachusetts and New York are ineligible for the HAMP program, since, according to the means test, they hold mortgages priced above the program's upper limit. President Obama's beleaguered housing strategy is perplexing, given that previous Democratic Presidents created successful housing programs. For example, Presidents Franklin Roosevelt and Harry Truman assisted millions of working-class families in achieving home ownership by creating the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) mortgage insurance program, as well as the FHA-VA program, which helped build military housing and assisted millions of returning war veterans to buy new homes. Although the homeownership rate fell last year to 67.3 percent, homeownership is still close to its all time high of 68.1 percent in 2001.
This lesson is not lost on all politicians. For example, Hillary Clinton, during her presidential nomination campaign, appeared to offer a bolder, macro-economic approach for solving the foreclosure crisis. Clinton supported the idea of placing a moratorium on all home foreclosures, to stabilize the decline of home values whilst encouraging lenders to modify mortgage terms to homeowners. Even Republican candidates such as John McCain got in on the act, promising to re-set mortgages to the lowered market-value of homes in order to assist underwater homeowners.
Inexplicably, the Obama Administration has not fully utilized the FHA, and other programs like it, despite the fact that these programs have been used frequently over the decades to assist both homeowners and lenders overcome difficult housing-market challenges. Creative financing ideas abound about how to assist lenders to modify home mortgages, such as "equity give-backs', which permit lenders to share in a home's appreciation when it is resold. Alternatively, there is the idea of having the FHA serve as the insurer of last resort (its current role), so as to protect lenders against losses that result from their modifying the terms of a homeowner's mortgage. In short, existing Federal programs work in partnership with lenders to assist homeowners escape mortgages they can no longer afford by transitioning them into a new housing situation, without having to resort to obnoxious public policy solutions such as default, foreclosure, or bankruptcy, all of which can only further imperil the recovery.
Sadly, the Obama administration has left distressed homeowners with few alternatives. This will make it difficult to solve our current economic downturn, because, as in the last Great Depression, housing construction jobs have disappeared in the depressed housing markets. It is bad enough that President Obama and a Democratic Congress failed to agree on even a weakened version of health care reform. If the home foreclosure crisis continues unattended, it will transform the stream of Republican state-wide victories into a tsunami of voter discontent headed directly towards the incumbents in Washington DC, namely, President Obama and congressional Democrats.
(William K. Barth is a California attorney who holds a doctorate in politics from the University of Oxford. Dr Barth worked for the US Department of Housing and Urban Development from 1994 to 2002. He writes a blog for the Huffington Post.)