203 online
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 13 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Prerequisite to Becoming a U.S. President; Leave Your Ethics and Morals Outside the Oval Office Door

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   4 comments
Message Michael Payne

Suppose you think of yourself as an honest, ethical, moral American. Question: Could you become the President of The United States? Of course you could if you conducted a strong, well-managed campaign, gathered millions of supporters and donors, and the majority of Americans elected you to this prestigious position. However, there is one small hitch in this scenario, a prerequisite that would need to be satisfied.

As the last several decades have shown, anyone who aspires to become our president must, upon entering the White House, leave his or her ethics and morals outside the Oval Office door. While that might be a disturbing thought for many Americans, it is certainly not a major issue for those who seriously feel that they are qualified for this high office and are more than willing to comply with that prerequisite in order to achieve their goal.

The President of the United States is often referred to as the most powerful person on earth. In ceremonial terms, that is exactly true for he is the titular head of America; but in reality, he reports directly to that ruling Establishment. He may think that he can change America, but he is powerless to do so, since, if he tries to use his true mandate from the American electorate, he will find that he will be blocked at every turn by those who control Washington. That's why it's mandatory to leave those morals and ethics outside the door; they have a nasty habit of getting in the way.

Considering the last several decades, the best example of a U.S. president, at least in my opinion, that honestly tried to follow his own conscience and carry out the responsibilities of the office in an ethical, honorable manner, is now often referred to as a presidential failure; his name is Jimmy Carter, a man who did experience some setbacks and some failures, but who stands head and shoulders above most of the others who, since JFK, have largely let themselves become tools of this Establishment.

While some may totally disagree and even laugh at my assessment of President Carter, the facts are that he did not pursue an agenda of war, did not invade and occupy sovereign nations, did not enable torture techniques, and did not oversee the erosion of the Constitutional rights of Americans. Yes, we had very severe inflation, but we did not experience massive recession and financial collapse. Those four years, even considering the Iran Hostage Crisis, where 52 Americans were held hostage for over a year, were relatively peaceful years for America; and wars did not control the nation's agenda.

But here we are in a new America in which our presidents must not allow themselves to be considered weak and indecisive; our presidents today are supposed to be strong, aggressive, warrior-types who are quick to take swift military action against any nation that we even suspect may be harboring ill will against our nation. It's a kind of shoot first and ask questions later type of mentality, and it has now become the official doctrine for a U.S. president.

The damage and destruction that has been brought down upon the nations and people of Iraq and Afghanistan, and, most recently, Pakistan is almost incomprehensible. The deaths of hundreds of thousands of Iraqis and displacement of millions of others is morally reprehensible, as are the deadly drone attacks that are raining death upon innocent civilians in Afghanistan and Pakistan. This carnage is commonly called "collateral damage" and routinely dismissed as simply the tragedy of war; but no, it is far more than tragedy; it is a striking example of moral failure.

So far America has been able to maintain the separation of church and state, for which I am extremely grateful; for if we ever end that separation of church and state both will be corrupted. While that separation is a good thing, we have now arrived at the point where it seems America is also separating morals and ethics from the functioning of government - that morals and ethics are anathema to governance.

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Well Said 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Michael Payne Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact EditorContact Editor
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Orwell's "1984" becoming a reality in modern-day America

Heed the Warning Signs; America is Edging Ever Closer to a Societal Implosion

Ethics and Morals in America; an Endangered Species

How Do You Spell Sociopath? G-O-P

The Beginning of the End for the U.S. Dollar as the World Reserve Currency

A U.S. President Defies Congress, the Constitution and the Will of the People; Will Impeachment Follow?

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend