WriterCarol J. Adams, in her books The Sexual Politics of Meat, and The Pornography of Meat, argues that women and animals share a similar type of oppression, in a culture that sexualizes dominance.
Feminist legal scholar Catharine A. MacKinnon, along with her late colleague Andrea Dworkin, has long argued that pornography is a form of trafficking and prostitution.
Two recent stories involving pornography have brought into question these two feminist theses.
First, the recent Supreme Courtcase on the legality of the depiction of animal cruelty - including a bizarre form of pornography - pits the issues of free speech against demonstrated harm.
The second story is the recent dust up at the Maryland system of universities, over the screening of pornographic movies on campus.
In both stories, the reaction seems to weigh heavily on the defense of First Amendment rights. In the animal cruelty case, the Justices were skeptical of a law against depicting animal cruelty (with exceptions for journalistic and educational uses), arguing that it is too broad. In the case of pornography on campus, the Washington Post coverage features numerous expressions of protest; The New Republic's Michelle Cottle's dismissal of the issue as a waste of time by legislators, takes a similar stance.
MacKinnon eloquently argues against the free speech frame for the use of women in pornography: