Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 1 Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (2 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   No comments, 4 series
Life Arts

Perusing the News with Editor, Mark Karlin

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Joan Brunwasser     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H4 9/7/15

Become a Fan
  (86 fans)


Mark Karlin
(Image by David Soto-Karlin)
  Permission   Details   DMCA
b>

My guest today is Mark Karlin, editor of BuzzFlash at Truthout. Welcome to OpEdNews, Mark.

JB: You've been covering a number of very interesting news stories. I'd like to focus on a few of them. First, please tell us about the group of young people who has sued the federal government. What's that all about?

MK: It's quite logical and appropriate. After all, it is adults - and generally older ones - who are perpetuating the destructive practices that are causing an acceleration of global warming. However, it is young people who will inherit the toxic and deadly earth-altering conditions created by the pernicious, greed-driven resistance to reducing climate change.

JB: Yes.

MK: So, the lawsuit by 21 young people described in my commentary, "Youth Sue US Government for Imperiling Their Future Through Inaction on Climate," is entirely understandable. It charges that the federal government has knowingly allowed practices to continue - particularly the minimally regulated use of fossil fuel - that threaten the lives, in the future, of these youth.

The lawsuit is also a shrewd public relations strategy. It refocuses the global warming argument to the devastating impact it will have on our children and grandchildren. That appeals to voters in a different way than just thinking about themselves. The lawsuit forces them to foresee the future of their families - and that is a bleak picture considering the lack of interest the US government has shown in seriously addressing the peril that lies ahead.

JB: What can you tell us about the young people filing this suit? Are they all from the same community, friends and neighbors? How did this come together?

MK: The young people are working with two organizations: Our Children's Trust and Earth Guardians. Obviously, attorneys who are of counsel to the organizations are legally representing the interests of the young people who are suing to ensure livable futures for themselves.

Interestingly, former NASA director James Hansen - a high-profile advocate for taking aggressive action immediately to reduce global warming - supports the lawsuit, and his granddaughter is one of the plaintiffs.

JB: That is interesting! What can this be other than a nuisance lawsuit? Is anyone actually expecting any kind of a legal victory?

MK: As editor of BuzzFlash at Truthout, I can't speak for the intentions of the lawsuit. However, despite the claims of conservative jurists, law is dynamic in the United States. What may appear as an overreaching legal claim today may be tomorrow's precedent in the courts.

Even if at first some lawsuits may appear unwinnable, the legal actions and publicity surrounding them assist in changing how such cases are perceived. After all, it's hard on the merits to deny that young people have a right to take legal action that might save their lives.

JB: True. It'll be interesting on many levels to see how this goes. Let's move on to another topic you've written about: the recent California decision to ban secret grand juries in some cases. What can you tell us about that?

MK: It has a very specific application as signed by Gov. Jerry Brown.

The law forbids secret grand juries in California when a government prosecutor is presenting evidence concerning a police officer who killed a person while on duty. This is in reaction to the perception - and, it appears, the general reality - that government prosecutors tend to, although not always, slant cases in favor of police officers who shoot people. This appeared to have happened in how St. Louis County Prosecutor Robert P. McCulloch - it is alleged by many - presented a mish-mosh of contradictory witness statements and random forensic papers to the grand jury investigating the shooting of Michael Brown by former Ferguson, Missouri, police officer Darren Wilson.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

http://www.opednews.com/author/author79.html

Joan Brunwasser is a co-founder of Citizens for Election Reform (CER) which since 2005 existed for the sole purpose of raising the public awareness of the critical need for election reform. Our goal: to restore fair, accurate, transparent, secure elections where votes are cast in private and counted in public. Because the problems with electronic (computerized) voting systems include a lack of (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon



Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */

Other Series: View All 8 Articles in "Police"

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Interview with Dr. Margaret Flowers, Arrested Tuesday at Senate Roundtable on Health Care

Renowned Stanford Psychologist Carol Dweck on "Mindset: The New Psychology of Success"

Howard Zinn on "The People Speak," the Supreme Court and Haiti

Snopes confirms danger of Straight Ticket Voting (STV)

Fed Up With Corporate Tax Dodgers? Check Out PayUpNow.org!

Literary Agent Shares Trade Secrets With New Writers