109 online
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 8 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 6/17/15

Permanent Alliances

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   5 comments
Message Sally McMillan

There's something about permanent alliances that's disturbing. It's like a license to do what you please knowing that your friends "have your back."

In recent years the U.S. has gathered such alliances. We have committed not only to support our "allies" in conflict situations, but also to provide them with weapons that make combat an attractive choice. We have subscribed to the idea that the enemy of my ally is my enemy. It's a sort of permanent view of how the world is divided.

Prior to WWII this methodology did not exist. Nations made alliances with other nations based upon the particular situation and estimates of individual and world interests. Coalitions changed. For example, throughout history most countries had varying alliances. In WWI Italy joined with Britain and France against Germany; in WWII Italy allied with Germany. In WWII Russia was allied with the U.S., Britain and France; in the following Cold War years Russia, for political and other reasons, became "the enemy."

During these years the U.S. entered the frays slowly and reluctantly, depending upon our appraisal of the situation and the need for U.S. assistance. We were not involved ipso facto through long-standing alliances that required us to join the fighting. We had the opportunity to thoroughly debate our involvement

But U.S. policy has changed. We have come to adopt the thinking of "permanent friends" and "permanent enemies." We have a professional military and a military arsenal strong enough to defend us and our friends at a moment's notice. We have forgotten our first president's advice to beware of permanent alliances. George Washington was aware that situations change, and our interests are not always the same as those of another nation. It is not in our interest to be so committed to another nation that we fight their wars. Nations should be responsible for their own defense.

The world has changed, of course, in the 21st century. Small groups and individuals, as well as nations, have the motives and the resources to initiate violent actions. It is more important than ever for the U.S. to weigh alternatives carefully, to seek nonviolent solutions to problems, to make friends not enemies.

Well Said 1   Supported 1   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Sally McMillan Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Sally McMillan is a mother, a grandmother, an activist and a writer. She's from Philadelphia, Iowa, and now Albuquerque. She has four children and 12 grandchildren.

She is a graduate of Chestnut Hill College, Philadelphia PA (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Missing Story - rejected by the Post

Can the World be Fixed?

Concert at the White House

The Tucson Tragedy

It's the People, Stupid

Sony Pictures in Hollywood has been Hacked

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend