Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 81 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 11/19/16

People to people approach is the best solution for Syria

By       (Page 1 of 3 pages)   1 comment
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Robert Weiner
Become a Fan
  (4 fans)

By Robert Weiner, Mahmoud Al Shaarawy and Ben Lasky

It's often said "there are no good options for Syria." Not exactly.

The war in Syria is tremendously complicated and its overlapping layers require a multi-layer solution. It is the biggest humanitarian disaster since WWII. A people-to-people approach would save millions of innocent souls. We should evoke examples like Alliance for Progress, Peace Corps, and VISTA1961--1969 which were the biggest U.S. aid programs toward the developing world up to that point--and called for substantial reform of Latin American institutions. It was an effective way to create a friendship and stabilize difficult situations in Latin America back at the 60s.

White Helmets is a group of some 3,000 volunteers has been credited with saving over 60,000 people from the rubble of buildings in war-torn Syria. This group could be the perfect example of what the international community should vastly support in Syria.

As the Syrian plight goes through its sixth year, it is still far away from a viable solution to stop bloodshed. Only uncertainty and further violence loom. The repercussions of the Syrian conflict echo loudly in Europe, which is plagued by a surge in terrorist attacks and bitter internal division about how to handle the rapidly-growing refugee crisis--one that caused Brexit.

U.S. cities like New York and Orlando are thousands of miles and an ocean and sea away from the nearest Syrian city. However, the perpetrators of the terrorist acts in these cities who declared their allegiance to ISIS, the perverted individuals who set off explosive devices and executed mass shootings, show that Syria is closer than Americans think.

US-Syria policy is in the midst of conflicting strategies and alliances. The U.S. and Russia are at odds over how to end the war, or rather, how to manage it. Maybe this will change in the Trump administration

President Obama created red lines and ignored them when Congress refused to authorize air strikes he had wanted. President Elect Trump has a plan but will not yet tell anyone about it. Secretary Clinton said in the third presidential debate, "I will continue to push for safe zones and safe havens not only to protect civilians and stop the constant flow of refugees, but also and frankly to gain some leverage on both the Syrian and Russian governments."

Russia has a stake in the prolongation of the conflict. If it loses its ally in Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, it would lose its toehold in the Mediterranean Sea and the Middle East.

Recently, Russia warned the U.S. against attacking the government's troops. That warning later translated in Moscow's announcement that it had beefed up its forces in Syria with S-300 air defense missiles, raised its troops from 3,000 to 9,000 and deployed navy forces in the Mediterranean.

President Obama claims it stopped Syria from using chemical stockpiles to commit genocide. Perhaps. Now, the US wants to help resolve the humanitarian crisis in Syria, the floods of refugees.

What are the options?

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Robert Weiner Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Robert Weiner, NATIONAL PUBLIC AFFAIRS AND ISSUES STRATEGIST Bob Weiner, a national issues and public affairs strategist, has been spokesman for and directed the public affairs offices of White House Drug Czar and Four Star General Barry (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Why Do Conservatives Vote Against Their Own Interest?

Jeb Bush's Elephant in the Room: Role in Bush v. Gore Recount

Mueller's End Game: Maybe As Soon As Trump Wants, But Not How He'd Like

Food Stamp Myth Busting

Iran: Nuclear Weapons or Peaceful Energy?

Bad money vs. bad money -- how Denver ballot measure could be blueprint for getting money out of politics

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend