Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (1 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   No comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

Patriotism Defined, First Amendment Explained.

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Ethan Indi     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 5 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Author 32780
Become a Fan
  (21 fans)


The Patriot Act acts, it is not real patriotism. The real patriotic act, the original formula to patriotism cannot be replaced, perhaps it can be bettered or perhaps the original theory is complete and may be not be improvable. The First Amendment, the first right of the people in the U.S.A., Amendment A#1 is the original Patriot Act. The prescription to properly confront oligarchical collectivism and isms of all sorts is presented in the very First Amendment in the U.S.A. Bill of Rights. The First Amendment is the formula and prescription to nonviolently fight monopolistic isms. It is the way in which change is conducted without hostile confrontation. The First Amendment defines patriotism.
All other Amendments are straightforward and pertain to particulars whereas the First Amendment is an amalgamation of many subjects because it is the explanation of patriotism, put in the form of, and protected as one right. There are five distinct parts to the First Amendment, five parts to the whole. These five distinctions spell out five separate rights and stages essential to form patriotism. These five rights and procedures to patriotism were formulated by the original patriots through their diplomatic, rhetorical and martial experience against the forces of the most powerful empire the world had known.

Throughout recorded time, the individual rights described in the First Amendment have been coercively and institutionally stomped out. Normally the stomping is done on a perceived "them" among an imagined "us" denoted by some institutionally conjured character judgment or fear based assumptions. Exploitation has been institutionally and individually driven, but when individuals are run over on a large scale it always begins with the removal of their First Amendment rights.
The First Amendment, the patriotic formula, was deciphered, enacted and scribed by the original patriots. There are five distinct parts to the First Amendment. To be a patriot one must question, communicate, speak out, stop and act. These rights are more commonly known as the Five First Amendment Freedoms.

Normally the First Amendment Freedoms are interpreted and presented as the freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly and petition. Everything is open for interpretation. This traditional presentation is not personal enough, not formulated as simple individual actions, but institutional procedure. The First Amendment protects these basic rights and provides direction to implement patriotism by making them as five fingers of a hand.

To be a patriot one must always question information in an unbiased manner without conniving intentions to make gains over others from answers. When a subject arises that needs scrutiny, one must communicate with others. The next step is to speak out in print or loud voice to the public at large about the subject in question. If the subject continues to be questionable, one stops and ceases participation in protest with others. If questions are left unanswered, if the subject remains questionable, if exploitation continues, then action is taken.

To meet the requirements of a patriotic action there must not be harm or violence done to others and nothing can be stolen as exemplified at The Boston Tea Party or Big Steep. Essentially there must be harm done to another. Actions might remain patriotic as long as no harm comes to the wellbeing and liberty of others. Such peaceful patriotic actions tend to be impenetrable to institutional operations and distortions. One must always defend oneself if physically threatened; this is the Second Amendment. Self-defense is a primordial and legal action and unless one intends to make a statement like Gandhi in the face of institutional sticks, legitimate.

When the right to free speech and free press is used to say bull or splatter insults, it's no longer patriotism, it's just a right. If one uses the right to question the interpretation of God simply to insult, divide or manipulate others, it is no longer patriotic. If people use these rights, this formula peacefully and in liberty, to instigate thought and progression, then and only then, are these actions patriotic.



STAGE ONE: QUESTION
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

http://www.amazon.com/Ethan/e/B0058V4P2U/ref=ntt_dp_epwbk_0

Ethan Indigo Smith is the son of a farmer and nurse who was later adopted by artists. Ethan was raised in Maine, Manhattan, and Mendocino, California. Ethan is a proud dropout. Ethan has traveled the world and has been employed briefly as (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon



Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

1984 And The Allegory of the Cave

Nuclear Experimentation Killed Free Power

Is Graffiti Art? Squaw Valley Audi FIS

The Failed Politics and Faulty Science of Climate Change

Swine Flu May Be Renamed; How about Fecal Flu?

GE + TEPCO = Fukushima/Entropy/Death Part II