Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 10 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 11/17/15

Paris terror attacks -- who profits?

By       (Page 1 of 4 pages)   2 comments
Become a Premium Member Would you like to know how many people have read this article? Or how reputable the author is? Simply sign up for a Advocate premium membership and you'll automatically see this data on every article. Plus a lot more, too.
Author 73066
Message Pepe Escobar
Become a Fan
  (190 fans)

Reprinted from Asia Times

Rescuers evacuate an injured person near the Bataclan concert hall in central Paris, early on Nov. 14
Rescuers evacuate an injured person near the Bataclan concert hall in central Paris, early on Nov. 14
(Image by Asia Times)
  Details   DMCA

Up to the very gloomy day when the "soldiers of the Caliphate" hit "the capital of abomination and perversions" -- as ISIS/ISIL/Daesh framed its attack on Paris -- French President Francois Hollande and his insufferable poseur of a Prime Minister Laurent Fabius were adamant: Assad must go.

For the Elysee palace, Assad equaled Daesh.

A measure of the incongruence of Hollande's administration is that none of his ENA-formed advisers told him he was becoming even more irrelevant than usual.

Russia and Iran were proving their point with the "4+1" (Russia, Syria, Iran, Iraq plus Hezbollah) actions on the ground and skies in Syria fighting all shades of Salafi-jihadism, "moderate" or otherwise.

And even the Obama administration -- after multiple meetings between Secretary Kerry and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov -- was correcting its course. That culminated in those pregnant with meaning 35 minutes of Obama and Putin face to face in a side table at the G-20 in Antalya on Sunday.

Guess who remained aligned with Hollande up to the last, tragic minute: the ideological matrix of all strands of Salafi-jihadism, Wahhabi Saudi Arabia, and the GCC minions. The French government "reward": plenty of juicy weapons deals. Here is just a partial list, coupled with hardcore French weaponizing of "moderate rebels."

So this is how "socialist" -- the dirtiest of words in the Beltway -- France fights its own GWOT (Global War on Terror): showering Rafales over "moderate rebel" enabler Doha, and with Salafi-jihadi weaponizer Riyadh as best client. Business, unsurprisingly, is booming.

It took an unprecedented carnage in Paris for Hollande, Fabius and Prime Minister Valls to wake up from their torpor and see which way the -- lethal -- wind was blowing. Now it's "war." It's "merciless." And it's against ISIS/ISIL/Daesh.

Already in Vienna on Saturday, Lavrov and Kerry -- seconded by the usual minions, some of them reluctantly -- finally agreed to designate Jabhat al-Nusra, aka al-Qaeda in Syria, as terrorists, not "moderate rebels."

And yet few in the West will remember poseur Fabius praising al-Nusra just a few weeks ago; they "do a good job" in Syria ("Ils font un bon boulot.")

A French fighter jet leaves to hit IS targets in Syria

Hollande, immediately after unveiling France's remix of the 2001 Bush-declared "war on terra," bombed Raqqa, the fake "Caliphate" capital. Fabius, in Antalya, defended the decision as "political"; France had to be "present and active" following the Paris massacre.

"Active" should be interpreted as "previously noncommittal," at best. But "political"? Not really; rather borderline unlawful. ISIS/ISIL/Daesh is not a state -- as much as they bill themselves as a "Caliphate." Assuming international law still applies, France's invoked right of "self-defense" is illegal. Not to mention Paris was not invited by Damascus to strike inside Syrian territory, unlike the Russian Air Force.

Finally displaced from its splendid slumber, the French government had to strike Raqqa because after all the whole world is watching. Coordinated raids erupted all across France, from Toulouse and Grenoble to Calais. France's only nuclear-powered aircraft carrier -- and Europe's top (naval) dog -- the Charles de Gaulle, leaves Toulon on Thursday for the Persian Gulf. Hollande proudly extolled the mission; it "bolsters Paris' firepower."

From torpor to resolve. But why only now?

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).


Must Read 5   Valuable 4   Well Said 2  
Rate It | View Ratings

Pepe Escobar Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Pepe Escobar is an independent geopolitical analyst. He writes for RT, Sputnik and TomDispatch, and is a frequent contributor to websites and radio and TV shows ranging from the US to East Asia. He is the former roving correspondent for Asia (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

You Want War? Russia is Ready for War

Why Putin is driving Washington nuts

All aboard the New Silk Road(s)

Why Qatar wants to invade Syria

It was Putin's missile?

Where is Prince Bandar?

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: