Power of Story
Send a Tweet        
- Advertisement -

Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (1 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   No comments
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Pakistan shelves talks with Taliban amid controversy over martyrdom?

By       Message Abdus-Sattar Ghazali     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 11/13/13

Author 65550
Become a Fan
  (6 fans)

From http://www.flickr.com/photos/44550450@N04/8625781802/: Protest against US wars and drone attacks
Protest against US wars and drone attacks
(Image by Fibonacci Blue)
  Permission   Details   DMCA
- Advertisement -
/p>

Pakistan government has virtually abandoned the projected peace talks with the Pakistani Talibans after the killing of the Tehreek-e-Taliban (TTP) leader Hakeemullah Mehsud in a US drone attack on November 1, 2013.

Interior Minister Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan told the National Assembly Tuesday that no dialogue could make headway until the United States stopped drone strikes at suspected militant hideouts in the tribal belt.

He repeated his argument that a dialogue process initiated by the government as mandated by the Sept 9 All Parties Conference had been "sabotaged" by a Nov 1 drone strike that killed the Taliban chief.

The minister said that the drone attack didn't target an individual instead it was an attack on peace process. He said that Taliban were willing to come to the negotiating table but the drone strike just 13 hours before the peace talks shattered the whole process.

- Advertisement -

He said he had told leaders of parliamentary parties earlier in the day that "we have to review the situation for the next three to four weeks" before deciding what to do next.

Who is a martyr?

The killing of Hakeemullah Mehsud in the US drone attack has not only resulted in the rupture of plans of peace talks with the Taliban but also sparked a heated debate on who is a martyr?

- Advertisement -

Syed Munawar Hassan, the Ameer of Jamaat-e-Islami (JI), a leading political party of Pakistan said last Friday that Hakeemullah Mehsud was a martyr while those fighting for the US cause inside Pakistan, including the military personnel, were not martyrs.  

Tellingly, not only religious parties, but also, some political parties' leaders have similar sentiments.

Maulana Fazlur Rehman, leader of Jamiat-e-Ulama-e-Islam (JUI), another leading religious political party,   told reporters last week that "even a dog killed by America is a martyr." He was asked if he considered Hakeemullah Mehsud, chief of the banned Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan killed in a US drone attack, to be a "martyr'.

Munawar Hussan's statement drew strong ire of the army which asked him to tender unconditional apology. In a statement the army condemned the remarks as "irresponsible' and "misleading', saying that declaring the dead 'terrorists' as shaheeds (martyrs) is insult of the sacrifice of thousands of innocent Pakistanis and soldiers of Pakistan's armed forces.

However, Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif said on Tuesday that those who have sacrificed their lives in fight against terrorism are "martyrs.' Addressing army officers at the General Headquarters in Rawalpindi, PM Sharif eulogized the services of the Pakistan Army for the country, adding that army has always remained in forefront to meet challenges whether in peace or war time.

However, the Jamat-e-Islami, which is a coalition partner of the government of the volatile Khyber-Pakhtunkhwah province, remained adamant and rejected the army demand to apologize.  

- Advertisement -

JI: No two opinions on martyrdom

On Tuesday, Jamaat-i-Islami secretary general Liaquat Baloch told a press conference that when a political and democratic government was functioning in the country, the armed forces and their public relations wing ISPR had no right to serve a notice on the head of a political party or to issue a press release. This act, he added, was a violation of the constitution. "If the army had any concern over the issue it should have taken up the matter with the Ministry of Defense rather than directly seeking an explanation from the JI chief."

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Author and journalist. Author of Islamic Pakistan: Illusions & Reality; Islam in the Post-Cold War Era; Islam & Modernism; Islam & Muslims in the Post-9/11 America. Currently working as free lance journalist. Executive Editor of American (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon



Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

U.S. Muslims condemn killings of American diplomats in Libya

Are we living in Orwell's 1984 Oceania surveillance state?

Pakistan's first Prime Minister Liaquat Ali Khan was assassinated by America

2001-2011: A decade of civil liberties' erosion in America -- Part One

85 percent Muslims voted for President Obama

2001-2011: A decade of civil liberties' erosion in America -- Part Two