In civilization, however, the two moral codes are often mis-applied, subconsciously pre-selected for tactical advantage. Psychopaths, who formerly led only in emergencies, have been able to create permanent crises to stay in power. These non-benign dictators own the food supply and declare control over a home-land with only their own truth permitted, evoking the same reactons we have to an upset mother.
The industrial revolution then destroyed the power of housewives, outsourcing most of their essential jobs, and gender roles went chaotic. Now, old-fashioned honour is just too much to expect. Political arguments usually can't be resolved, because each side dismisses any contrary evidence, but never sees the different moral codes at the base of the disagreement. Only true progressives are willing to trust democracy and the justice of their peers.
Nobody minds if a mother is lying about Santa Claus or the bogeyman, but about 10% of the time, for the good of our genetic health and evolution, she also has to lie about paternity. Therefore, it is better all around for her to have the last word in domestic disputes, and that is the usual case. Plutocrats now usurp that power by triggering similar emotional reactions.
Looking for the influence of the two moral codes easily makes sense of many common puzzles, and changes the perception of history radically. Our goal should be gender parity, not gender equality. That lets us be ourselves and have win-win relationships.