Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
OpEdNews Op Eds

On Imposing Accountability

By       Message Terry Sneller       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     Permalink    (# of views)   8 comments

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 2   Interesting 2   Valuable 2  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H3 7/8/16

Author 90704
- Advertisement -

Grand Jury
Grand Jury
(Image by PennLive/Washington Post)
  Permission   Details   DMCA

Why are officers of the law allowed to shoot and kill citizens and not be prosecuted?

Well, consider this brief overview of the current legal processes involved, when an officer of the law kills a citizen:

- Advertisement -

It starts when the local government prosecutor -- whose mandate is to attempt to convince a secret Grand Jury to seek an indictment -- presents his evidence. It should be pointed out, that there are no records kept of the proceedings and that there are no representatives for the defense present.

Critically, it must be kept in mind that this prosecutor may spend his entire career working directly with members of the police department. Routinely, when building a criminal case, the prosecutor must rely on those officers for their cooperation in providing case details, evidence, witnesses, interviews, court appearances, etc. Therefore, is it even conceivable that ANY prosecutor -- who is interested in being effective inside his tight-knit legal community -- would seriously attempt to bring to trial even one police officer and thus risk being "black balled" by the balance of his local police force? Not very likely!

So there is the bottleneck in our legal system. We have established, and are using, a process which is not only NOT conducive to prosecuting police officers who are guilty of murder, but instead structured to thwart that very process.

- Advertisement -

Perhaps, because I'm not a lawyer, the solution seems quite simple, to me. I purpose that in cases involving a police shooting of a citizen, all legal proceedings should be passed up to a higher, perhaps specially convened, court. For example, if the shooting occurred in a municipal district, it should be passed up to a state system; a state police shooting would go to a Federal jurisdiction.

It seems to me, that by changing the way in which these cases are initially treated in the legal system, we would impose some long overdue accountability -- which would not only act as a deterrent for the police officers, but also more readily identify and remove those who are psychologically unfit for that challenging occupation.

(Article changed on July 9, 2016 at 10:40)


- Advertisement -

Well Said 2   Interesting 2   Valuable 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact EditorContact Editor

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

An Open Letter To All Who Want To Know Who Wears The Boot On Our Neck

Lobotomizing Capitalism

The Illusion of Truth Cognitive Dissonance and Denial

An Open Letter To All In Pursuit Of Truth

There Is A Rot Across The Land

Why We Kill