Power of Story
Send a Tweet        
- Advertisement -

Share on Google Plus 1 Share on Twitter 2 Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (6 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   5 comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

North Dakota's War on 1st Amendment Goes From Bad to Worse

By       Message Fair News     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 3   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 10/16/16

- Advertisement -

See original here

By Jim Naureckas

Amy Goodman reporting on the Dakota Access Pipeline.
Amy Goodman reporting on the Dakota Access Pipeline.
(Image by Democracy Now!)
  Permission   Details   DMCA

- Advertisement -

North Dakota State's Attorney Ladd Erickson has dropped criminal trespassing charges against Democracy Now!'s Amy Goodman -- and is instead seeking to charge her with participating in a riot, Democracy Now!(10/15/16) reported today.

Both sets of charges relate to Goodman's coverage of protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline project, which is opposed by a Native American-led coalition that is concerned about its threat to sacred and historic sites, North Dakota's water resources and the planet's climate. While accusing a journalist of trespassing for covering a breaking story of vital public interest is a clear threat to freedom of the press (FAIR.org, 9/15/16). A riot charge would be even worse, because it would attempt to criminalize Goodman's point of view as a reporter.

In emails to Goodman's lawyer quoted by Democracy Now!, Erickson acknowledged that it would be difficult to convict Goodman of trespassing because of "legal issues with proving the notice of trespassing requirements in the statute." But Erickson suggested that Goodman could be charged with rioting because she "was not acting as a journalist" while documenting security guards using pepper spray and siccing attack dogs on protesters. Erickson asserted to the Bismarck Tribune (10/11/16) that Goodman was "a protester, basically. Everything she reported on was from the position of justifying the protest actions."

- Advertisement -

Erickson's professors at law school no doubt explained to him that the First Amendment does not permit prosecutors to charge people with crimes based on their point of view. Whether Goodman was covering the story because she thought it was important news or because she sympathized with the protesters -- or simply because she's doing the job she's paid to do -- does not affect the fact that she was acting as a reporter.

Under Erickson's legal theory, reporters covering Birmingham's protests in the 1960s would have been stripped of the protection of the Bill of Rights if it could be proved that they intended to show that Bull Connor's treatment of civil rights marchers was unjust. This kind of interrogation of journalists' motives needs to be rejected, and hopefully will be when Erickson's request to charge Goodman goes before a District Judge John Grinsteiner on Monday, October 17.

As the Center for Constitutional Rights' Katherine Franke said in response to Erickson's prosecutorial threat:

"Filming Native Americans being violently attacked as they defend their land is not rioting, it's called journalism, it is protected by the First Amendment, and indeed, it is an essential function in a democratic society."

Deia Schlosberg
Deia Schlosberg
(Image by Twitter)
  Permission   Details   DMCA

- Advertisement -

Meanwhile, documentary filmmaker Deia Schlosberg has been charged in North Dakota's Pembina County with three felony counts in connection with her filming Dakota Access protests: conspiracy to theft of property, conspiracy to theft of services and conspiracy to tampering with or damaging a public service (Huffington Post, 10/14/16).

These charges, too, appear to be based on prosecutors' presumption that Schlosberg was sympathetic to the protest, which State's Attorney Ryan Bialas deemed to be "not a protest" but "a criminal action." It seems it's illegal for journalists to have political opinions in North Dakota.

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 3   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

http://fair.org/

FAIR, the national media watch group, has been offering well-documented criticism of media bias and censorship since 1986. We work to invigorate the First Amendment by advocating for greater diversity in the press and by scrutinizing media (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon



Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

North Dakota's War on 1st Amendment Goes From Bad to Worse

As Democratic Voters Shift Left, "Liberal Media" Keep Shifting Right

Neo-Nazi Group Linked to Murder of British MP Has Long Been Ignored by US Media

The People Are the Story -- and Corporate Media Are Missing It

Abuse Charges Against a Former Cop Are Disturbing -- as Is the Lack of Media Interest

Did Sanders Lie About Clinton's Oil Money? NPR Factchecker Can't Be Bothered to Check