Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 89 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (90 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   2 comments
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

No Security Without Community

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Eric Lucas     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Interesting 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H4 9/20/12

Author 80363
Become a Fan
  (7 fans)

Today, elections are about the acquisition of government power to enable the victors to establish their view of the best social order.   Often the opposing views breakdown to security versus community.   But is this a real choice?  In my view, there is no security without community.

Hobbes and Maslow

Thomas Hobbes wrote his famous work on government, "Leviathan" in the year 1651. Hobbes asserted that we need government to guarantee our security. He believed government kept man's basic nature in check. He saw man's nature as base and violent which if not held in check by external force, would lead to a perpetual state of war: the war of "every man against every man." He described human life without government as "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short."   

However, since Hobbes, one of the most prominent thinkers was a psychologist named Abraham Maslow. Who, is widely considered to be the founder of humanistic psychology. He is known for creating the theory of, "the Hierarchy of Needs."  In his signature work, "Motivation and Personality" his goal was to develop a psychology of health.

Consider Maslow's discussion of the unhealthy person:

"For the basically deprived man the world is a dangerous place, a jungle, an enemy territory populated by (1) those whom he can dominate and (2) those who can dominate him. His value system is of necessity, like that of the jungle denizen, dominated and organized by the lower needs...p. 232."  

Note the similarity of Maslow's unhealthy person to the war-centered "human" of Hobbes.  

Maslow's Chapter Twelve is entitled: "Self-Actualizing People: a Study of Psychological Health."   He describes healthy individuals as "problem-centered" rather than "ego-centered."   Healthy people "have some mission in life..." and a "more efficient view of reality."   "They have for other human beings a deep feeling of identification, sympathy, and affection"what Adler called the older-brotherly attitude."   The unhealthy must develop these qualities.  

These are quite different value systems. The Hobbesian political view is based on an unhealthy psychological condition. Today "deprivation psychology" finds its cousin in "deprivation political philosophy." Per theory, power is pursued in order to obtain security.  

However, "self-actualizing" psychology reflects health. Individuals feel no deprivation, instead feeling the "need" for life purpose. "Fulfillment-psychology" finds its cousin in "Communitarian" forms of political philosophy. Power is pursued to form a better community or as the writers of the Preamble to the Constitution put it: to form a more perfect union.

In modern times we have seen an example of each view.

The Bush Presidency

In 2004, author Ron Suskind wrote an article entitled: "Faith, Certainty and the Presidency of George W. Bush." Suskind, in trying to understand the Bush administration, purportedly interviewed Karl Rove.   Suskind wrote:

"[Rove] said that guys like me were ''in what we call the reality-based community,'' which he defined as, people who ''believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality"'' ''That's not the way the world really works anymore,'' he continued. ''We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality -- judiciously, as you will -- we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors . . . and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.''

This "reality does not matter," fact-adverse view, produced the falsity-based war in Iraq, trillion dollar deficits and runaway financiers who nearly destroyed our economy. I submit that this "empire now," power- as-an-end, type of thinking is bankrupt without an organizing purpose.          

Purpose, Vision and FDR

Next Page  1  |  2


- Advertisement -

Must Read 1   Interesting 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Eric Z. Lucas is an alumnus of Stanford University (Creative Writing Major: 1972-1975), the University of Washington (1981: BA English Literature and Elementary Education) and Harvard Law School, J.D. 1986. Since law school he has been a public (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Black Lives Matter: The Problem of Citizenship

Create the Compassionate Society

Redefining Citizenship Can End the War on Drugs

Black Lives Matter: Voting Rights Are Not Enough

Incognito versus Wooden: The Mythology of Ruthlessness

Demonization and Political Rhetoric