Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 72 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
OpEdNews Op Eds    H4'ed 10/31/16

Neocon and Neolib--Pick Your Poison

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   2 comments
Follow Me on Twitter     Message j dial
Become a Fan
  (32 fans)

(Image by J Dial)   Details   DMCA

Even when not in the midst of some campaign we hear a lot about neocons and neoliberals. Ever wondered what the words mean? As policy labels they are not interchangeable although as epithets both may apply.

Their precursors, conservatism and liberalism, existed equably enough in Western economics for some time. Although not identical there was commonality: Conservatism espoused low taxes with minimal government debt and spending while liberalism endorsed trade free of government intrusion.

With the prefix those progenitors diverged. In a nutshell, neocons were about foreign policy and neoliberals domestic policy.


The United States is the beacon that lights the world. It is indispensable to order and justice in the world, which makes it exceptional. It has the best system of governance, one it is eager to share, even to impose, for what is good for the US is good for the world.

The US gallantly accepts her role as the ruler of the world--a benevolent ruler with brawn. As such, the US must spread her enlightened, economically liberal policies into the failed states or oppressive regimes that need those policies, whether or not they agree. The Middle East is ripe for correction, as mistaken in its tumult as a naughty child, and never mind the causes; the US looks ahead, not behind. Furthermore, the turmoil there threatens Israel, and this will not be tolerated. There must be a freshly governed, democratized--and, needless to say, biddable--Middle East cleansed of its past as a breeding ground for terrorists. Peace is attainable only through the healing balm of strong US leadership, and strong leadership is proven by war.

It is this imperial mindset, resolute in its aim to spread the word, that the US once projected onto evil machinating commies back in the first Cold War.


Economic liberalism, entrenched in the US until early last century, was challenged by the Great Depression, which finally lost its hold when governments and central banks intervened to put people back to work. But over the last 25 years as capitalist profits shrank, the slumbering corporate giant awoke, donned its tattered liberal gown, and called it neo.

Here the beacon is the free and shining market. To reach its full effulgence this beacon must be undimmed by regulation, unions, or price controls. Government services are superfluous as the market exists to fulfill those needs and better. Public services are replaced by individual responsibility, the common good by self-made men, government teats by wily coyotes.

There is an exception. Corporations, as we now know, are people. When you think about it, though, it's not quite the same. Not for the reason that you might think--that corporations are purely legal entities devoid of life certainly in their rarefied consumptive upper echelons--but rather because corporate people have the rights without the responsibilities of mere breathers. Subsidies and loopholes are kosher for the corporate. Better yet for corporations and those with sufficient wealth to partake is a whole separate and unequal investor-state dispute-resolution legal system, which, since its dark gestation under NAFTA, has become positively engorged; the exception that makes its own rules.

But for the mere flesh-and-blood unincorporated citizen-cum-consumer, if you want to read a book, go buy one. If you want to grow crops, Monsanto provides engineered seeds whose progeny won't germinate. If you want a drink of water, shell out for, as Nestle's CEO Peter Brabeck says, clean drinking water is not a right; it's a product. If the TPP comes into unholy existence and you publish an article that a corporation says causes it to lose money, somebody is going to pay for those lost profits. And if you should fail to justify your existence in the dispassionate eyes of the decider you're defective or lazy, and in either case you don't deserve to live.


In a perversion of 'think globally, act locally', neoliberalism arose locally but, enabled by neocon militance, spread and seeks to continue its spread, for what is good for the US is good for the world. Commonality restored, neocons and neolibs differ mainly in the means they employ. Now, tentacles entwined in a soulless embrace, neopolity seeks to cover, convert, and conquer the world.

(Image by J Dial)   Details   DMCA

And if you've ever wondered whether Hillary Clinton is a neocon or a neoliberal, the answer is yes.

Must Read 1   Interesting 1   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

J Dial Social Media Pages: Facebook Page       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Schooled in psychology and biomedical illustration, of course I became a medical writer!

In 2014 my husband and I and our kitty moved from Colorado, where Jerry had been born, to Canada, where I had been. (Born.)
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Who Turned Scientific American?

Seeds of destruction: It's NOT just about food

Who the Frack's Really in Charge?

Fracking: Water Issues--Colorado-centric, but applicable to all

Why Barack Obama Does Not Disappoint Some Folks

Where Have all the Finches Gone?

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend