65 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 63 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H4'ed 3/9/15

Nearly At "Full Employment"? 10 Reasons Why The Unemployment Numbers Are A Massive Lie

By       (Page 1 of 3 pages)   3 comments

Michael Snyder
Message Michael Snyder

Reprinted from The Economic Collapse


Copyrighted Image? DMCA
>

On Friday, we learned that the official "unemployment rate" has fallen to 5.5 percent. Since an unemployment rate of 5 percent is considered to be "full employment" by many economists, many in the mainstream media took this as a sign that the U.S. economy has almost fully "recovered" since the last recession. In fact, according to the Wall Street Journal, some Federal Reserve officials believe that "the U.S. economy is already at full employment."

But how can this possibly be? It certainly does not square with reality. Personally, I know people who have been struggling with unemployment for years and still cannot find decent jobs. And I get emails from readers all the time that are heartbroken because they are suffering through extended periods of unemployment. So what in the world is going on? How can the government be telling us that we are nearly at "full employment" when so many people can't find work? Could it be possible that the government numbers are misleading?

It is my contention that the official "unemployment rate" has become so politicized and so manipulated that it is essentially meaningless at this point. The following are 10 reasons why...

#1 Since February 2008, the size of the U.S. population has grown by 16.8 million people, but the number of full-time jobs has actually decreased by 140,000.

#2 The percentage of working age Americans that have a job right now is still about the same as it was during the depths of the last recession. Posted below is a chart that shows how the employment-population ratio has changed since the beginning of the decade. Does this look like a full-blown "employment recovery" to you?"

Civilian employment-population ratio
Civilian employment-population ratio
(
Image by US Bureau of Labor Statistics)   Details   DMCA

#3 The primary reason for the decline in the official "unemployment rate" is the fact that the government now considers millions upon millions of long-term unemployed workers to "no longer be in the labor force." Just check out the following numbers...

"The number of Americans participating in the labor force has been on a decline for the past few years. Nearly 33 percent of the Americans above age 16 are not part of the workforce, the highest number since 1978. The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) report issued recently has found 92,898,000 Americans above age 16 not a part of the labor force of the country as on February 2015.

"When President Obama took over the office in January 2009, nearly 80,529,000 Americans were not a part of the labor force. The number has increase[d] by nearly 12 million over the last few years."

#4 Over the past couple of years, the labor force participation rate in this country has been hovering near mutli-decade lows...

"The labor force participation rate hovered between 62.9 percent and 62.7 percent in the eleven months from April 2014 through February, and has been 62.9 percent or lower in 13 of the 17 months since October 2013.

"Prior to that, the last time the rate was below 63 percent was 37 years ago, in March 1978 when it was 62.8 percent, the same rate it was in February."

#5 When you add the number of "officially unemployed" Americans (8.7 million) to the number of Americans "not in the labor force" (92.9 million), you get a grand total of 101.6 million working-age Americans that do not have a job right now. Does that sound like "full employment" to you?

#6 The quality of our jobs continues to decline. Right now, only 44 percent of U.S. adults are employed for 30 or more hours each week.

#7 Millions upon millions of Americans have been forced to take part-time jobs because that is all they can find, and wages for American workers are at depressingly low levels. The following numbers come directly from the Social Security Administration...

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Well Said 2   Must Read 1   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Michael Snyder Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

19 Facts About The Deindustrialization Of America That Will Blow Your Mind

Nearly At "Full Employment"? 10 Reasons Why The Unemployment Numbers Are A Massive Lie

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend