Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 3 Share on Facebook 5 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 6 (14 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   36 comments
OpEdNews Op Eds


By       Message lila york     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 3   Valuable 3   Well Said 2  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H2 4/10/12

Author 11671
Become a Fan
  (87 fans)
- Advertisement -

Indefinite Detention by Occupy Wall Street

New legislation introduced in the Senate two weeks ago by Senator Mark Udall (D-CO) fully repeals  sections 1021 and 1022 of the National Defense Authorization Act. These are the sections that allow indefinite imprisonment of American citizens and legal residents by the military without habeas corpus, evidence, trial or legal representation. The bill is  THE DUE PROCESS AND MILITARY DETENTION AMENDMENTS ACT OF 2012, sponsored by Senator Mark Udall (D-CO) in the Senate and Congressman Adam Smith (D-WA) in the House. It has 40 co-sponsors in the House, and no co-sponsors in the Senate. The bill number is S2175 and HR4192. This NEW bill amends the NDAA to :

1) Repeal section 1022 altogether (the bill nullifies the requirement of military custody of civililans; and

2) Guarantee that any person detained within the United States shall ONLY be remanded to a civilian court and that all persons will be guaranteed all due process rights guaranteed in the constitution.

(Read the bill here: ) This bill officially nullifies sections 1021 and 1022 of the NDAA, the sections pertaining to indefinite detention by the military of American citizens and legal residents.

This is NOT the same bill as Senator Feinstein's  Due Process Guarantee Act, a bill I have, until today, been supporting with a petition. Senator Feinstein's bill  does not repeal the NDAA. It amends the Authorization to Use Military Force of 2001, and says that for any future   authorizations of military force, or any future declarations of war, citizens cannot be indefinitely detained without due process - unless Congress passes new legislation stating so. It also does not protect citizens from military custody, and does not define due process as trial in a civilian court, but as any criminal process the military sees fit.
To find your representatives and how they voted on the NDAA, go here:
click here

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -


- Advertisement -

Must Read 3   Valuable 3   Well Said 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

Lila York is a choreographer and activist. Her website is

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Fukushima - The Elephant in the Room

JFK to 911: Everything is a Rich Man's Trick - - a film by Francis Richard Conolly The Rise of the American Shadow Govt


The Election Fraud Resource List - How They Stole it from Bernie

A dozen bankers are destroying civilization- and governments don't care