Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 2 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 11/6/16

Last Minute Election Interference Isn't New in D.C. -- But This Time the Post Isn't Celebrating

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   No comments
Become a Premium Member Would you like to know how many people have read this article? Or how reputable the author is? Simply sign up for a Advocate premium membership and you'll automatically see this data on every article. Plus a lot more, too.
Author 54958
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Pete Tucker
Become a Fan
  (1 fan)

Front page of Washington Post, March 11, 2014Imagine, on the eve of a contested election, a top law enforcement official accuses a candidate of potentially serious misconduct. But instead of putting the charges before a judge or jury, the top official levels them in the court of pubic opinion, just as voters head to the polls.

Sound familiar?

Hillary Clinton isn't the first to face this. It happened just two years ago.

The office at stake wasn't 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, but 1350 -- the D.C. mayor's office.

And the response of the media wasn't widespread condemnation as it is today.

In 2014, D.C. Mayor Vincent Gray was leading his primary challenger, Muriel Bowser. Then U.S. Attorney Ron Machen stepped in.

Just a week before early voting began, Machen accused the mayor of knowing about a shadow campaign that aided Gray's upset win four years earlier.

Despite Machen's years-long investigation, he never turned his accusations against Gray into charges; nor did his successor, who quietly brought the investigation to a close five years after it began.

Machen's actions had an impact: Gray was defeated, his reputation badly tarnished.

"My reelection was sabotaged, and District voters were duped," Gray wrote in a recent op-ed entitled "I know what it's like when law enforcement intervenes in an election. It happened to me."

Eric Holder, the former attorney general and Machen's boss at the time, defended Machen's election-eve accusations.

But now Holder is "deeply concerned" with this practice -- at least when it comes to Clinton, who he's supporting.

Last week, FBI Director James Comey sent a vague, unsolicited letter to Congress (and thereby the public) saying the FBI was revisiting its previously closed investigation into Clinton's use of a private server for emails.

President Obama weighed in, criticizing Comey without naming him. "We don't operate on incomplete information," Obama said.

Holder also rebuked the FBI director. By discussing his "personal opinions" on the eve of the election, Comey committed "a stunning breach of protocol" which "may set a dangerous precedent," Holder wrote in an op-ed.

Holder's hypocrisy is outdone by the media, led by the Washington Post.

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).


Rate It | View Ratings

Pete Tucker Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Pete Tucker is an independent DC reporter.

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

How The Washington Post Covers for a Top D.C. Official

How Change Happens: 18 Acts of Resistance

A Must-Read in Trying Times: Chomsky's 'Requiem for the American Dream'

Backed by $10 million in 'Dark Money,' Gorsuch Claims He's Apolitical

Is RFK Jr. 'Anti-Vaccine'?

Is the FBI Out of Control?

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: