Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
OpEdNews Op Eds

Last Minute Election Interference Isn't New in D.C. -- But This Time the Post Isn't Celebrating

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Pete Tucker       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     Permalink    (# of views)   No comments

Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H3 11/6/16

Author 54958
Become a Fan
  (1 fan)

Front page of Washington Post, March 11, 2014
Front page of Washington Post, March 11, 2014
(Image by Twitter)
  Permission   Details   DMCA
- Advertisement -
Imagine, on the eve of a contested election, a top law enforcement official accuses a candidate of potentially serious misconduct. But instead of putting the charges before a judge or jury, the top official levels them in the court of pubic opinion, just as voters head to the polls.

Sound familiar?

Hillary Clinton isn't the first to face this. It happened just two years ago.

The office at stake wasn't 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, but 1350 -- the D.C. mayor's office.

- Advertisement -

And the response of the media wasn't widespread condemnation as it is today.

In 2014, D.C. Mayor Vincent Gray was leading his primary challenger, Muriel Bowser. Then U.S. Attorney Ron Machen stepped in.

Just a week before early voting began, Machen accused the mayor of knowing about a shadow campaign that aided Gray's upset win four years earlier.

- Advertisement -

Despite Machen's years-long investigation, he never turned his accusations against Gray into charges; nor did his successor, who quietly brought the investigation to a close five years after it began.

Machen's actions had an impact: Gray was defeated, his reputation badly tarnished.

"My reelection was sabotaged, and District voters were duped," Gray wrote in a recent op-ed entitled "I know what it's like when law enforcement intervenes in an election. It happened to me."

Eric Holder, the former attorney general and Machen's boss at the time, defended Machen's election-eve accusations.

But now Holder is "deeply concerned" with this practice -- at least when it comes to Clinton, who he's supporting.

Last week, FBI Director James Comey sent a vague, unsolicited letter to Congress (and thereby the public) saying the FBI was revisiting its previously closed investigation into Clinton's use of a private server for emails.

- Advertisement -

President Obama weighed in, criticizing Comey without naming him. "We don't operate on incomplete information," Obama said.

Holder also rebuked the FBI director. By discussing his "personal opinions" on the eve of the election, Comey committed "a stunning breach of protocol" which "may set a dangerous precedent," Holder wrote in an op-ed.

Holder's hypocrisy is outdone by the media, led by the Washington Post.

Next Page  1  |  2


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

Pete Tucker is an independent DC reporter.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

How The Washington Post Covers for a Top D.C. Official

A Must-Read in Trying Times: Chomsky's 'Requiem for the American Dream'

How Change Happens: 18 Acts of Resistance

Backed by $10 million in 'Dark Money,' Gorsuch Claims He's Apolitical

Is RFK Jr. 'Anti-Vaccine'?

Is the FBI Out of Control?