Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 11 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H2'ed 11/20/15

La Guerre en Rose

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   2 comments
Become a Premium Member Would you like to know how many people have read this article? Or how reputable the author is? Simply sign up for a Advocate premium membership and you'll automatically see this data on every article. Plus a lot more, too.
Author 73066
Message Pepe Escobar
Become a Fan
  (190 fans)

Reprinted from Sputnik

Paris tragedy
Paris tragedy
(Image by vinal vladislav)
  Details   DMCA

"It's war." French President Francois Hollande in 2015 did echo George W. Bush in 2001. France has now entered its own "war on terra," complete with mini-Patriot Act ("etat d'urgence") against ISIS/ISIL/Daesh.

Exit la vie en rose. Enter la guerre en rose. And the war, in Hollande's definition, will be "merciless."

It took a carnage for the French political establishment to be hurled away from its splendid torpor. Until 11/13 -- Paris tragedy day -- for the Elysee palace Bashar al-Assad equaled Daesh. As much as Petro Poroshenko in Ukraine was the good guy fighting "Russian aggression."

In fact "Russian aggression" ended up being aggressed -- via the FSB-established bombing of the Metrojet A321 -- even before the suicide bombing/shooting spree in Paris.

"Russian aggression" had already launched a serious offensive against Daesh, as part of the "4+1" coalition (Russia, Syria, Iran, Iraq plus Hezbollah). France, for its part, was lobbing the odd, disinterested strike as part of a US-led, and remarkably inefficient, coalition featuring, among others, Salafi-jihadi enablers/financiers/weaponizers Saudi Arabia and Turkey.

The Paris carnage did change everything. At the G-20 in Antalya, during a by now iconic 35 minutes face-to-face with President Putin, President Obama finally seemed to have gotten the message; yes, there will be war. But the enemy is not "Russian aggression"; it's Daesh.

No sleep till Raqqa

Martial France is now all huff and puff. Jean-Yves Le Drian, France's Defense Minister, "has just invoked Article 42.7," as he tweeted from Brussels. What he meant is that he formally requested help from France's EU partners. According to the Lisbon Treaty, in case of "armed aggression," EU nations have "an obligation of aid and assistance by all means in their power."

This is the first time ever this article in the EU treaty has been invoked.

So the "armed aggression" is from Daesh; a non-state actor posing as a "Caliphate" with a return address in Raqqa, eastern Syria, the "Caliphate" capital.

Even before requesting EU help, France was already bombing Raqqa, following what Russia had been doing for weeks. Now the geopolitical plat du jour is to bomb Raqqa. International law experts will cringe about the legality of it all -- considering that Russian Air Force strikes at least were formally authorized by Damascus.

Euphemistically, France wants "increased military participation" from other EU nations in selected "operational theatres." In Brussels newspeak, this means bombing the hell out of Daesh anywhere in "Syraq."

As the logic of war is already on, the next step would be for France to invoke NATO's Article 5 -- which stipulates that an "armed aggression" against one ally applies to all allies; thus their right to wage war as "self-defense," under the UN charter.

Article 5 has been invoked only once; by the US after 9/11.

The Pentagon, which runs NATO, is cryptically enthusiastic. Pentagon head Ash Carter has let it slip, "We're looking to do more, we're looking for every opportunity we can to get in there and go at [Daesh], but we need others to" get in the game as well."

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).


Must Read 4   Valuable 4   News 2  
Rate It | View Ratings

Pepe Escobar Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Pepe Escobar is an independent geopolitical analyst. He writes for RT, Sputnik and TomDispatch, and is a frequent contributor to websites and radio and TV shows ranging from the US to East Asia. He is the former roving correspondent for Asia (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

You Want War? Russia is Ready for War

Why Putin is driving Washington nuts

All aboard the New Silk Road(s)

Why Qatar wants to invade Syria

It was Putin's missile?

Where is Prince Bandar?

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: