Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 17 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Kristoff: "Pro-Mubarak" Attackers are Government-Sponsored Thugs, Photographic Proof

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   1 comment
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Ralph Lopez
Become a Fan
  (12 fans)
Please send this to your congressmen as the media is attempting to portray a "clash" between "Mubarak supporters" and anti-government protesters, in order to lend Mubarak an air of legitimacy.  If we let them know we are ahead of the curve, pressure will increase on Mubarak to leave the country.

The New York Times' incredibly courageous Nicholas Kristoff is bearing witness to what the Egyptian protesters already know and are telling the world, that the "pro-Mubarak" crowds attacking peaceful protesters are government-sponsored thugs.  Furthermore, hard evidence is surfacing which reinforces Kristoff's reports, that the entirety of the "pro-Mubarak" protesters consist of out-of-uniform police, common criminals released and paid to fight, and members of the state's massive security apparatus, which outnumbers the army by 2 to 1.

Kristoff posted at his Facebook:

I was in Tahrir today, and I must say that "clashes" is the wrong word for what happened. This was a violent government-sponsored crackdown using thugs.

Turning to his blog he reports:

Today President Mubarak seems to have decided to crack down on the democracy movement, using not police or army troops but rather mobs of hoodlums and thugs.

I've been spending hours on Tahrir today, and it is absurd to think of this as simply "clashes" between two rival groups. The pro-democracy protesters are unarmed and have been peaceful at every step. But the pro-Mubarak thugs are arriving in buses and are armed -- and they're using their weapons.

In my area of Tahrir, the thugs were armed with machetes, straight razors, clubs and stones. And they all had the same chants, the same slogans and the same hostility to journalists. They clearly had been organized and briefed. So the idea that this is some spontaneous outpouring of pro-Mubarak supporters, both in Cairo and in Alexandria, who happen to end up clashing with other side -- that is preposterous.

The army from all reports is standing by doing nothing, and indeed letting the hoodlums through, a move which now implicitly sides them with Mubarak.  


"Why don't you protect us?" some shouted at soldiers, who replied they did not have orders to do so and told people to go home.  "The army is neglectful. They let them in," said Emad Nafa, a 52-year-old among the protesters, who for days had showered the military with love for its neutral stance.

ABC News:

"Members of security forces dressed in plain clothes and a number of thugs have stormed Tahrir Square," three opposition groups said in a statement.

Protesters are saying they should have stormed the presidential palace yesterday and driven Mubarak out, gotten it over with.  This is what comes of the US buying Mubarak more time, this is how he "leads" an "orderly transition."

And now a blogger brings to light what is confirmed to be a police ID captured from a pro-Mubarak thug by anti-government protesters, via Twitter.  This clear physical evidence buttresses Kristoff's report that the attackers are all on the government payroll, either criminals released and paid to commit violence or police forces out of uniform. 

Image here, with requested Arabic speaker commentary from Facebook.

(Image by Unknown Owner)   Details   DMCA

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Must Read 1   News 1   Supported 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Ralph Lopez Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linked In Page       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Ralph Lopez majored in Economics and Political Science at Yale University. He writes for Truth Out, Alternet, Consortium News, Op-Ed News, and other Internet media. He reported from Afghanistan in 2009 and produced a short documentary film on (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Wikileaks Soldier Reveals Orders for "360 Rotational Fire" Against Civilians in Iraq

Why Obama Will Not Veto NDAA Military Detention of Americans: He Requested It.

McChrystal Trying to Tell Us Something? "We're F%^*king Losing This Thing"

BoA Dumps $75 Trillion In Derivatives On Taxpayers, Super Committee Looks Away. Seize BoA Now.

Obama Lied: Taliban Did Not Refuse to Hand Over Bin Laden

Arrests at White House Over NDAA Military Detention of Americans, Occupy Wall Street Joins Fight.

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend